Anatomy of Public Procurement

Jääskeläinen, Jan; Tukiainen, Janne

doi:10.2139/ssrn.3372135

Cited by 9 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…According to Lucica Sintea, the procurement process must support genuine competition that facilitates the selection of the most effective offers, namely the purchase of the best product, service or work at the best price [5,48]. Usually, the participants in public procurement are different in size, which is likely to limit competition [6,2].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Significant contribution to the development of the system of public procurement and its control and analytical support has been made by leading domestic scientists such as: L. Katrosha [1], G. I. Pinkas [2], V. Yu. Kwach [3], R. V. Afanasiev [3], A. V. Chernihivskaya [7], N. G. Zdyrko [14; 21], O. D. Shevchuk [14], J. V. Falko [15], and foreign experts: J. G. Murray (2009) [4], L. Sintea (2016) [5], J. Jääskeläinen & J. Tukiainen (2019) [6], D. Coviello (2017) [17], S. Gagliarducci (2017) [17], J. Palguta (2017) [18], F. Pertold, (2017) [18], M. Mironov (2016) [19], E. Zhuravskaya (2016) [19], K. Gugler (2015) [19], M. Weichselbaumer (2015) [20] and C. Zulehner (2015) [20].…”

Section: Brief Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Public procurement in Ukraine as a state governance instrument: evaluation, control, improvement

Kaletnik¹,

Zdyrko²

2019

EA-XXI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article examines public procurement in the state administration. Its decisive role in implementing the concept of sustainable development as an instrument of economic, social and environmental policy has been proved. Tactical and strategic goals of public procurement are detailed. Problematic aspects of public procurement (changing legislation, inconsistency of the concept apparatus and the lack of proper organization of supervisory bodies) are outlined. The authors of the article focus on the established components of public procurement in accordance with legal requirements, as well as the classification of procedures for their implementation. The peculiarities of implementation of procedures for different types of public procurement in terms of their value and the order of fulfillment are determined. The article deals with analytical evaluation of public procurement in Ukraine, including positive tendencies for the growth of quantitative and qualitative indicators. Examples of reasons for disqualifications and rejection of participants are given. Special attention is paid to the composition and subordination of the controlling bodies of public procurement. The present research deals with the main tendencies of the state financial control. The authors of the article study typical violations of control results. The necessity of reforming the control system in order to increase its effectiveness has been proved. Information on state control bodies and appeals in foreign countries is presented along with the need for elimination of duplication of functions and powers of the controlling bodies. The model of the organization of the state financial control through creation of a single controlling specialized body, the Public Procurement Inspectorate, which includes representatives of all state bodies and public organizations, is proposed to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of control.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Brief Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Public procurement in Ukraine as a state governance instrument: evaluation, control, improvement

Kaletnik¹,

Zdyrko²

2019

EA-XXI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hal ini disebabkan karena masih terbatasnya akses data tender/seleksi pengadaan pemerintah ataupun belum diterapkannya sistem pengadaan secara elektronik. Sebagian besar negara maju yang memiliki data yang komprehensif dan tersedia bagi publik, telah menerapkan sistem eprocurement (Jääskeläinen & Tukiainen, 2019;İ. Onur, Özcan, & Taş, 2012Gupta, 2002.…”

Section: Latar Belakangunclassified

Kompetisi dan Efisiensi pada Pengadaan Pemerintah: Bukti Empiris pada Kementerian/ Lembaga di Indonesia

Tulungen

Adrison

2021

ITRev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates the effect of the number of bidders at the final evaluation stage before determining the winner on the ratio of the winner's bid price and the estimate price (HPS) on the tender and selection packages to ministries/institutions in Indonesia. This study uses 82,560 data cross-section on tender and selection packages obtained using techniques website scraping on 49 LPSE websites of Ministries/Institutions in Indonesia from 2008 to March 2020. To determine this effect, this study uses OLS and IV-2SLS methods to reduce the potential for bias due to endogeneity. This study found that there was an effect of the number of bidders in the final evaluation stage on the ratio of the winner's bid price and HPS, which would reduce the ratio by 0.0335 units or save procurement spending by tender or selection by 3.35% on the value of HPS. In addition, we also found that there was an indirect effect on the value of the procurement package, the prequalification method and the evaluation pattern on the number of bidders in the final evaluation stage before determining the winner.

show abstract

“…First, we speak to an emerging set of studies looking into competition in public procurement processes. Public procurement often suffers from an extremely low number of bids (e.g., Jääskeläinen and Tukiainen, 2019) and resulting high prices. 9 Hence, recent studies relate observed low levels of competition to procurement design and draw conclusions regarding procurers' tendency of raising entry barriers to improve supplier selection (Kang and Miller, 2020;Coviello et al, 2018a).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Second, we contribute to the literature on the spatial allocation of contracting firms and procurement authorities. Empirically, procurement contracts are often allocated to firms in the proximity of the contracting authority (Jääskeläinen and Tukiainen, 2019;Kutlina-Dimitrova and Lakatos, 2016). To some degree, this reflects natural entry costs, but both stated policy goals of "buy local" 10 and potential political connections (Szucs, 2018;Baltrunaite, 2019;Baltrunaite et al, 2020;Ryan, 2020;Baranek and Titl, 2020) have been used as explanations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Are the Priorities of Bureaucrats? Evidence From Conjoint Experiments With Procurement Officials

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A well-functioning bureaucracy is a precondition for efficient public goods provision. However, bureaucratic decision-making is still largely seen as a black box. We provide novel insights into the preferences of bureaucrats regarding their work outcomes. We focus on a major public sector activity and survey more than 900 real-life procurement officials in Finland and Germany. The questionnaire includes hypothetical choice experiments to study the relative importance of multiple features in tender outcomes. First, bureaucrats state to have substantial discretion at work but no important incentives. Second, our experimental results show that procurers are particularly worried about avoiding negative risks concerning prices and supplier reputation. Third, an avoidance of bidders with prior bad performance appears to be an extremely important factor. Fourth, procurers value a certain degree of competition, while litigation concerns and regional favoritism play only a small role. The striking lack of heterogeneous effects points towards the role of intrinsic motivation among public buyers in countries with high public sector capacity.

show abstract

Anatomy of Public Procurement

Cited by 9 publications

References 42 publications

Public procurement in Ukraine as a state governance instrument: evaluation, control, improvement

Public procurement in Ukraine as a state governance instrument: evaluation, control, improvement

Kompetisi dan Efisiensi pada Pengadaan Pemerintah: Bukti Empiris pada Kementerian/ Lembaga di Indonesia

What Are the Priorities of Bureaucrats? Evidence From Conjoint Experiments With Procurement Officials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About