2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the impact of credit migration in a portfolio setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed by Fabozzi (), the likelihood of a rating downgrade for investment grade bonds is significantly greater than the likelihood of upgrade. The pattern is similar for speculative grade bonds: for example, Tsaig et al () report the rating migration rate for bonds initially rated Ba to Baa is 6.25%, while the migration rate for bonds initially rated Ba to B is 8.48% over the 1970–2007 period. Therefore, if investors’ ex ante expectation is that a downgrade is more likely than an upgrade, then an increase in delta (which reduces credit risk) should have a greater incremental effect on yield spread than a proportional increase in vega (which increases credit risk), to the extent that the greater ex ante likelihood of a downgrade has already been priced into the bond.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As discussed by Fabozzi (), the likelihood of a rating downgrade for investment grade bonds is significantly greater than the likelihood of upgrade. The pattern is similar for speculative grade bonds: for example, Tsaig et al () report the rating migration rate for bonds initially rated Ba to Baa is 6.25%, while the migration rate for bonds initially rated Ba to B is 8.48% over the 1970–2007 period. Therefore, if investors’ ex ante expectation is that a downgrade is more likely than an upgrade, then an increase in delta (which reduces credit risk) should have a greater incremental effect on yield spread than a proportional increase in vega (which increases credit risk), to the extent that the greater ex ante likelihood of a downgrade has already been priced into the bond.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…the creditor are willing to accept. Another issue connected with p is that, given a certain rating, the default probability due to the possibility of rating migrations usually increases over time (see for instance Tsaig et al (2011)). This is not incorporated in the multi-period framework suggested above as it would make things more complicated.…”
Section: Hedging Diversification and The Riskyness Of The Cash Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , e N are independent from S. The vector R T i describes the sensitivity 1 In a broader sense, losses may also arise from rating migrations if the rating of the counterparty changes; see, for instance, Tsaig et al (2011). 2 Eckert et al (2016) discuss a credit portfolio framework that allows for dependence between PD, LGD and EAD; see also Kaposty et al (2017) and Farinelli and Shkolnikov (2012).…”
Section: Credit Risk and Credit Portfolio Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%