2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-58782011000400007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical models correlation for vehicle dynamic handling properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the understeer gradient increases with the increase in weight on the front axle. Therefore, with the increase in weight on rear axle, the result exhibit tendency to oversteer behavior [11,12]. The trends of study results hold well when compared with the theoretical predictions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…That is, the understeer gradient increases with the increase in weight on the front axle. Therefore, with the increase in weight on rear axle, the result exhibit tendency to oversteer behavior [11,12]. The trends of study results hold well when compared with the theoretical predictions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In contrast, at high velocities, the Figure 7 should be rather considered. = − is defined as the understeer gradient [19]:…”
Section: The 4ws Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the front and rear roll stiffness is assumed to contribute as parallel stiffness, so that one quarter of the vehicle can serve as physical substitute model. To obtain the favored roll-angle gradient, the implemented antiroll bar stiffness is calculated as presented by Vilela et Barbosa [33]. The roll moment depends on the mass 䁆, the lateral acceleration and the Center of Gravity (CG) height…”
Section: Roll Center and Anti-roll Bar Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%