Most of the chassis systems are developed by automotive suppliers to improve a specific vehicle performance. Drivers, and consequently vehicle manufacturers, are more concerned by the overall behaviour of the Vehicle. Many coordination architectures have been proposed in the literature in order to integrate different chassis systems in a single vehicle. In this paper, these architectures are compared and discussed. Two major classes are proposed: Downstream and Upstream Coordination. The purpose of this classification is to help car manufacturers and suppliers standardize an Integrated Vehicle Dynamics Control architecture for faster and more flexible designs.

No abstract

Redundancy of integrated systems has always been used in order to increase vehicle's safety. Some new technologies are however too expensive to be redundant. This paper proposes a new way to preserve the safety by enabling a kind of complementarity between different chassis systems. Optimization-based control allocation redistribution algorithms are used in order to find the best way to combine conflicted systems. Results have shown that one system can take over another one when a failure occurs making the control logic fault-tolerant and reconfigurable. This suits better future cars as additional chassis systems are intended to be integrated.

Most of automotive researches focus on autonomous vehicles. Studies regarding trajectory planning and trajectory tracking became preponderant. As in case of commercial ground vehicles there is a driver in the loop, one should raise the important question of how the trajectory should be tracked. In this paper, we investigate the influence of controlling integrated chassis systems on the vehicle's behavior. A fixed Model Predictive Control is used to track the trajectory. Tunable vehicle motion control is however used to provide different motion feelings. Results show that a specific trajectory could be followed in different manners. Therefore, vehicle dynamics can be and should be controlled in such a way to generate adaptive trust feelings to passengers in case of autonomous driving.

Vehicle motion control has many challenges to overcome. One of the main problems is robustness against not only environmental changes but also uncertainties about the vehicle itself. This paper focuses on this problem using robust control design at the control architecture's high level. Researches tend to decentralize the control to treat longitudinal and lateral dynamics separately. Here, an overall vehicle model is first proposed and studied to justify the structure that the high-level controller should embrace. Co-simulation results of different combinations showed promising performances to face uncertainties and couplings. Therefore, robust techniques combined with control allocation techniques may enhance autonomous vehicles reliability.