2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2009.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical model of particle interference effects in divergent erosive jets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average abrasive particle mass flow rate was measured before and after each channel was machined, by weighing with a micro-mass balance (accuracy¼0.01 mg) the amount of powder blasted for a minute into a special container that was covered with filter material which prevented the particles escaping, while also preventing back pressure. The measured mass flow rate range of 1.4-2.7 g min À 1 was low enough to ensure that particles rebounding from the surface did not interfere with incoming particles [20,21].…”
Section: Ajm Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average abrasive particle mass flow rate was measured before and after each channel was machined, by weighing with a micro-mass balance (accuracy¼0.01 mg) the amount of powder blasted for a minute into a special container that was covered with filter material which prevented the particles escaping, while also preventing back pressure. The measured mass flow rate range of 1.4-2.7 g min À 1 was low enough to ensure that particles rebounding from the surface did not interfere with incoming particles [20,21].…”
Section: Ajm Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been reported by several authors [167,169,174,180], particle interaction during erosion testing can significantly affect the measured rates. In order to optimize the SPE methodology and ensure the acquisition of good quality data, we evaluated the effect of WD and f r on the SPE measurements.…”
Section: Spe Methodology Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…They found that the particle flux (feed rate per surface area) is a determining factor in predicting particle interference effects. In a more recent series of articles, combining experimental and modeling results, Papini, Spelt and coworkers [167,170,174,176,178,180] showed for normal incidence SPE that the erosion rates decrease for increasing WD because of an increased inter-particle collision probability when the volume between the nozzle outlet and the surface increases. Therefore, in order to optimize the testing methodology of our erosion test rig using the long aspect ratio nozzle, we present in Chapter 5 a study on the effects of feed rate and WD on the SPE of brittle bulk materials and show that particle interference effects can reduce erosion rates by as much as 40 %.…”
Section: Spe Methodology Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other researchers have also extensively investigated the particle velocity effect on the solid particle erosion behavior of materials [32,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. Figure 2(a) shows erosion rates of samples as a function of particle pressure at 30°, 60° and 90° impingement angles.…”
Section: Solid Particle Erosion Behavior -Eroded Surfaces Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%