2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-020-04175-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of various ETL materials for an efficient perovskite solar cell by numerical simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mesh sizes are N ∈ [3, 11]. The obtained results approved with preceding experiment one, 18 exact one, 20 finite difference, 29 SCAPS 1‐D simulation software, 35 and finite element method 34 and over mesh size ≥9 and execution time 5.25 second, as shown in Table 2. It is also shown in this table that the introduced technique yields accurate results.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The mesh sizes are N ∈ [3, 11]. The obtained results approved with preceding experiment one, 18 exact one, 20 finite difference, 29 SCAPS 1‐D simulation software, 35 and finite element method 34 and over mesh size ≥9 and execution time 5.25 second, as shown in Table 2. It is also shown in this table that the introduced technique yields accurate results.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The regularization parameter is σ ∈ [1.0 h z − 1.75 h z ]. The results approved with preceding exprirement one, 18 exact one, 20 finite difference, 29 SCAPS 1‐D simulation software 35 and finite element method 34 over mesh size ≥7, execution time 2.0 second, (2 M + 1) ≥ 3 and σ = 1.75 h z .…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations