2021
DOI: 10.1109/ojpel.2021.3072503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the 1st and 3rd Quadrant Transients of Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Double-Trench SiC Power MOSFETs

Abstract: In this paper, dynamic switching performance at 1 st and 3 rd quadrant operation of Silicon and Silicon Carbide (SiC) symmetrical and asymmetrical double-trench, superjunction and planar power MOSFETs is analysed through a wide range of experimental measurements using compact modeling. The devices are evaluated on a high voltage clamped inductive switching test rig and switched at a range of switching rates at elevated junction temperatures. It is shown, experimentally, that in the 1 st quadrant, CoolSiC (SiC … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike Silicon MOSFET, SiC MOSFET is more sensitive to gate stressing because there is Carbon presented at the oxide-channel interface which are potential origins for the traps as well as its wide band-gap property makes traps of more energy level involved in the trapping/de-trapping of electrons [1,2]. Therefore, with the same oxide thickness, SiC MOSFET shows more threshold voltage shift than Silicon MOSFET [3,4]. The threshold voltage drift closely affects the circuit operation.…”
Section: Investigation On Threshold Voltage Instability Under Sweepin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike Silicon MOSFET, SiC MOSFET is more sensitive to gate stressing because there is Carbon presented at the oxide-channel interface which are potential origins for the traps as well as its wide band-gap property makes traps of more energy level involved in the trapping/de-trapping of electrons [1,2]. Therefore, with the same oxide thickness, SiC MOSFET shows more threshold voltage shift than Silicon MOSFET [3,4]. The threshold voltage drift closely affects the circuit operation.…”
Section: Investigation On Threshold Voltage Instability Under Sweepin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the temperature increases to 175°C, such deviations by slowing down the sweeping speed is minimized. In theory, high temperature would cause more traps generated in the oxide layer [4] which yield more threshold voltage drift. However, the Constant Current method is the industrial approach to extract the threshold voltage that fits the ID to VGS equation of MOSFET in the linear region thus the mobility degradation with temperature rise would increase the required VGS to reach the current value as in VTH definition.…”
Section: Sweeping Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in transfer characteristics, are more prone to failure at repetitive short-circuit events than the fresh devices. However, these studied have primarily focused on conventional planar structured SiC MOSFETs, while there are newly developed trench-structured SiC MOSFETs with improved dynamic performance [18], [19] which lack similar studies. The cross-sectional schematics for planar structured power MOSFETs and the two trench power MOSFETs as symmetric & asymmetric are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-sectional schematic drawing of the devices under test is shown in Fig. 1 as Planar, Symmetrical Double-trench and Asymmetrical Double-trench structures [14]. Compared with the planar MOSFET which is the conventional structure, symmetrical double-trench MOSFET is able to deliver lower on-resistance [15], [16] as it implements trenched source region to suppress the E field stress on the gate oxide [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%