2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of temporal variation in human masticatory cycles during gum chewing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower stability could be a result of the orofacial components disabilities. For the control of the involved structures in chewing function, it is necessary that the system handles both the variations found in the properties of food and the need to generate precise orolinguofacial movements (Crane et al, 2013). Indeed, the TMD group had worse general myofunctional status, including changes in mandibular and tongue mobility, in agreement with previous findings (De Felício, Medeiros, Melchior, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The lower stability could be a result of the orofacial components disabilities. For the control of the involved structures in chewing function, it is necessary that the system handles both the variations found in the properties of food and the need to generate precise orolinguofacial movements (Crane et al, 2013). Indeed, the TMD group had worse general myofunctional status, including changes in mandibular and tongue mobility, in agreement with previous findings (De Felício, Medeiros, Melchior, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, while our study was of natural feeding on solid food, many standard swallow study protocols objectively assess difficulty of swallowing using liquid swallows of various volumes [68, 69] or of solid food [49, 50]. However, detailed kinematic analysis of such clinical data has not been performed to characterize preceding, during, and following swallows in human during natural feeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The squeeze-back mechanism of swallowing, in which the tongue contacts the palate from anterior to posterior to ‘squeeze’ the bolus into the oropharynx, is the only mechanism employed in human and macaque swallowing of solid foods, whereas other mammals utilize undulation of the tongue for transport for the bolus to the oropharynx when swallowing solid foods [14–17]. Although there are some arguments as to how many phases are defined within each gape cycle [49], the four-phase gape cycle of mandibular movement, fast close (FC), slow close (SC), slow open (SO), and fast open (FO), has been successfully applied to characterize videofluoroscopic (VF) data of human feeding sequences [47] and a recent study explained variation in phase durations of gum chewing behavior in human [50] in a similar way to a comparative study looking at various animal species including non-human primates [51]. Additionally, tongue and hyoid movements are coordinated with the above-mentioned four-phase gape cycle of mandibular movement similarly in humans and macaques [16, 47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean duration of the cycle observed in this study is consistent with those described in previous surveys, which showed variations ranging from 0.61 to 1.04 s (3,5) . In order to maintain the total duration of the cycle stable, the neuronal control of the masticatory movements -central pattern generator (CPG) -can act by modulating the duration of the opening, closing and occlusal phases of the masticatory cycle (26) . Although these modulations were not investigated in the present study, it is possible that they have contributed to the absence of effects on temporal variables such as number of cycles and duration of the sequence and the masticatory cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%