An index for the evaluation of 3D masticatory cycles stability

Ferreira, Cláudia Lúcia Pimenta; Zago, Matteo; Felício, Cláudia Maria de; Sforza, Chiarella

doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.07.016

Cited by 7 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 35 publications

(57 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As for the construct evaluation, a statistically significant difference was found between the SG and CG regarding the clinical examination of pain on palpation and mandibular mobility. This result corroborates those of studies that reported changes in mandibular mobility (15,16) and sensitivity to palpation on the masticatory and cervical muscles in individuals with TMD (14,24) .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Strength of agreement: a = very good; b = good; c = moderate; d = reasonable; e = poor examination of the masseter and temporal muscles is justified by the fact that individuals with TMD, in the presence of lower PPT by algometry, presented higher scores at the MBGR Protocol, unlike participants without this dysfunction, which is in agreement with a study that observed a negative correlation between TMD severity and muscle PPT (29) . Concerning the breathing function, nasal breathing was verified in all participants with TMD, corroborating studies that did not observe changes in this function (15,16,19) . Considering that Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) measurement presents good accuracy in detecting nasal obstructive changes (30) , this measure confirmed the clinical findings as the participants showed values indicative of normality, that is, absence of nasal obstruction.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

“…Regarding the content evaluation, the MBGR Protocol includes the analysis of the orofacial structures and habitual posture of lips and tongue that may be altered in cases of TMD (16,19,24) ; mobility of the lips and mandible that may be impaired in this population (14)(15)(16)19) ; masticatory function, for which there is consensus among studies of the presence of disorder in this function (5,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)26) ; deglutition, referred to as atypical or adapted in cases of TMD (14,16,(19)(20)(21)(22)25) ; speech, allowing identification of cases with phonetic and TMJ disorders (14) . Thus, the MBGR Protocol encompasses the Orofacial Myofunctional Disorders (OMD) described in the literature for individuals with TMD.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fourteen studies were selected after a literature review on functional changes presented by patients with TMD (5,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria adopted (Chart 1).…”

Section: Mbgr Protocol -Content Validationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Validação do protocolo de avaliação miofuncional orofacial MBGR para adultos com disfunção temporomandibular com deslocamento de disco com redução

Bueno

Rosa

Genaro

et al. 2020

CoDAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO Objetivo Este estudo visou validar o Protocolo de Avaliação Miofuncional Orofacial MBGR para adultos com DTM. Método Participaram 30 adultos, sendo 15 com DTM (deslocamento de disco com redução segundo o Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders) e 15 Controles. O processo de validação envolveu a validade de conteúdo, de critério e de construto, além da concordância inter e intra-avaliador, sensibilidade e especificidade. Considerou-se nível de significância de 5%. Resultados Foram confirmadas as validades de conteúdo, visto que o Protocolo MBGR abarca todas as questões funcionais presentes em indivíduos com DTM; de critério, com correlações significantes entre o MBGR e AMIOFE; e de construto, diferenciando indivíduos com e sem DMO quanto à dor à palpação e mobilidade mandibular, com correlação significante entre a avaliação clínica do MBGR e o uso do algômetro digital, bem como confirmação do exame instrumental para a classificação do modo respiratório. A força de concordância variou de pobre a muito boa para a análise interavaliador e de razoável a muito boa para intra-avaliador. Os valores de sensibilidade e especificidade foram elevados. Conclusão O Protocolo MBGR mostrou-se válido para aplicação em adultos com DTM com deslocamento de disco com redução e controles, contemplando todos os aspectos que possibilitam a análise das condições oromiofuncionais nesses indivíduos.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Mbgr Protocol -Content Validationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Validação do protocolo de avaliação miofuncional orofacial MBGR para adultos com disfunção temporomandibular com deslocamento de disco com redução

Bueno

Rosa

Genaro

et al. 2020

CoDAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In an overview, these patients may have a perception of reduced masticatory ability or greater difficulty to chew, unilateral mastication, changes in rhythm, pattern and strength, incoordination and limitation of mandibular movements, a longer time to chew, worse efficiency or masticatory performance, less accurate recruitment of temporal and masseters muscles on the working and balancing sides, besides kinematic alterations and less stability of the masticatory cycles …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Masticatory behaviour and chewing difficulties in young adults with temporomandibular disorders

Ferreira

Sforza

Rusconi

et al. 2019

J of Oral Rehabilitation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Difficulties and limitations on masticatory function are among the main reasons why patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) seek care.Objective: To evaluate the masticatory behaviour and perception of chewing difficulties in adults with mild TMD of recent onset, considering the presence of malocclusion.Methods: Eighty-one young adults were divided into groups according to the presence of TMD and malocclusion: Non-TMD Normal Occlusion (n = 18), Non-TMD Malocclusion (n = 22), TMD Normal Occlusion (n = 18) and TMD Malocclusion (n = 23). TMD was assessed using the TMD Research Diagnostic Criteria and volunteers also answered questionnaires regarding their perception about jaw functional limitation and difficulty to chew foods of different textures. Masticatory and swallowing behaviours were assessed using the Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES) protocol. Chewing time and chewing frequency taken to ingest the test-food were also obtained. Two-way-ANOVA was used to analyse the TMD, occlusion and TMD × occlusion interaction effects.Results: Temporomandibular disorder effect was observed on vertical jaw mobility and jaw function limitation total scores, meaning that groups differed in the perception of opening limitation and mandibular limitation according to TMD status with a medium effect size. Also, more changes in chewing function (OMES-chewing score) and higher chewing frequency was observed in the presence of TMD (P < 0.05).Occlusion effect was only observed on OMES-swallowing score and no TMD × occlusion interaction effect was observed. Conclusion:Changes in chewing behaviour, frequency and perception of mandibular limitation was observed in the presence of TMD, pointing out the importance of functional evaluation when planning and establishing a treatment plan. K E Y W O R D Sdental occlusion, eating behaviour, mastication, self-perception, temporomandibular joint dysfunction How to cite this article: Ferreira CLP, Sforza C, Rusconi FME, Castelo PM, Bommarito S. Masticatory behaviour and chewing difficulties in young adults with temporomandibular disorders.

show abstract

Myofunctional orofacial examination tests: a literature review

Kilinc,

Mansiz

2023

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Myofunctional orofacial examination (MOE) is an important tool for the assessment of the stomatognathic system and orofacial functions, and the early diagnosis of orofacial myofunctional disorders. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to scan the literature and determine the most preferred test for myofunctional orofacial examination. Materials and Methods A literature review was conducted to collect information. Pubmed and ScienceDirect database was explored by using keywords gained by MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Results Fifty-six studies were retrived from the search and all of the studies were screened and evaluated regarding the subject, aim, conclusions and the orofacial myofunctional examination test they used. It has been observed that traditional evaluation and inspection methods have been replaced by newer and methodological approaches in recent years. Conclusions Although the few tests used differ, 'Orofacial Examination Test With Scores’ (OMES) was found to be the most preferred myofunctional orofacial evaluation method from ENT to cardiology.

show abstract

An index for the evaluation of 3D masticatory cycles stability

Cited by 7 publications

References 35 publications

Validação do protocolo de avaliação miofuncional orofacial MBGR para adultos com disfunção temporomandibular com deslocamento de disco com redução

Validação do protocolo de avaliação miofuncional orofacial MBGR para adultos com disfunção temporomandibular com deslocamento de disco com redução

Masticatory behaviour and chewing difficulties in young adults with temporomandibular disorders

Myofunctional orofacial examination tests: a literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About