2001
DOI: 10.1248/jhs.47.483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Malodorous Volatile Substances of Human Waste: Feces and Urine.

Abstract: The amounts of volatile substances responsible for the malodor of human waste (feces and urine) obtained from the storage tank of a community waste-water treatment plant were determined. Thus far, there has been little systematic research on malodor-causing substances of human waste. These substances were collected using Tenax-TA, and their concentrations were determined by the usual thermal-desorption coldtrap injector/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (TCT/GC/MS). About 90% of the malodor-causing substanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
3
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
35
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These two last compounds, together with pinane-cis and -trans, are partially hydrogenated compounds that correspond to the first steps of reduction reactions but whether they contribute to the typically faecal odour is unknown. Surprisingly, some other compounds that are commonly believed to be responsible for faecal odour, such as methyl sulphides, volatile fatty acids, skatole or indole (Monroe, 1985;Suarez et al, 1998;Sato et al, 2001), were either not found in our study or only present in low levels in some dung extracts (indole, skatole, dimethyltrisulphide and methylthioanisole). However, these compounds are known to produce a very strong odor, even at very low concentration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…These two last compounds, together with pinane-cis and -trans, are partially hydrogenated compounds that correspond to the first steps of reduction reactions but whether they contribute to the typically faecal odour is unknown. Surprisingly, some other compounds that are commonly believed to be responsible for faecal odour, such as methyl sulphides, volatile fatty acids, skatole or indole (Monroe, 1985;Suarez et al, 1998;Sato et al, 2001), were either not found in our study or only present in low levels in some dung extracts (indole, skatole, dimethyltrisulphide and methylthioanisole). However, these compounds are known to produce a very strong odor, even at very low concentration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Methyl mercaptan was detected at 2-15 ppb in only three of the seven subjects. The concentrations of both substances were lower than those in the malodorous gas from human waste reported previously, 10) probably because feces immediately after defecation is less decomposed by microorganisms than human sewage waste. However, as the thresholds of olfactory sensitivity 15,16) for methyl mercaptan and hydrogen sulfide are low, their odor intensities, which represent the human olfactory sensitivity to them, are high, and they are considered to contribute significantly to the odor of feces.…”
Section: Determination Of Concentration Of Sulfur-containing Compoundscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Mass spectral identifications and quantitative measurements were performed by methods similar to those used in our previous study. 10) Determination of Fatty Acids, and Aliphatic and Aromatic Compounds ---After 10 l of the malodorous components in the sampling bag were adsorbed at room temperature onto the trapping agent (Tenax-TA) by the method shown in Fig. 2(A), the volatile compounds on the trapping agent were analyzed using TCT/GC/MS under the conditions shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indole derivatives, occurring widely in plants and animals, play important roles in biological and clinical aspects, 9-13 whereas indole vapors are typical malodorants. [14][15][16][17][18] Neither real-time monitors nor gas detector tubes for indole vapors has been available so far, 5 though highly sensitive instrumental analyses such as chromatographic [19][20][21][22][23] and electrochemical [24][25][26][27] methods have long been employed. While detection of indoles in solution has been extensively used for qualitative (spot-test) [28][29][30][31] as well as quantitative analyses, [32][33][34] no solid sensor for indole vapors based on the Ehrlich-type reactions has been reported so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%