Analysis of Lawsuit Against the Factual Action which Conducted by Military after Law Number 30 Year 2014 Concerning Government Administration

Abstract

The enactment of law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration has caused a paradigm shift under development of state administration decision (in short term known as KTUN). By virtue of article 87 of Law number 30 year 2014, KTUN was not only on the written form, but it can also be a factual act. This causes a change in the absolute competence of lawsuit on factual actions taken by the government from the district administrative court (PTUN). It is arises a question whether Article 87 of Law number 30 year 2014 also applies to claims for factual actions committed by the military. The formulation of problems in this research are 1) The position of a lawsuit against factual actions committed by the military before Law number 30 year 2014 and 2) the claim position against factual actions committed by the military after Law Number 30 Year 2014. This research is a doctrinal research by using a statute approach and conceptual approach. The result of the analysis found that the KTUN paradigm have change under Law number 30 year 2014, which does not affect the absolute competence of lawsuits for factual actions carried out by military, though a government were excluded as mentioned on Article 2 of Law Number 9 of 2004 on Amendments of Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court. It was confirmed under Article 87 of Law 30/2014, which grammatically states that the only changes to the KTUN are those in Law 51/2009, Law 10/2004, and Law 5/1986. The application of lex specialist pictured under the act number 30 year 2014 which regulated the administrative decision by the government, however concerning the military only regulated under the act number 31 year 1997. Further, the absolute competence on handling the legal factual action by the military since the implementation of law number 30 year 2014 is still held in the district court.

Controversy on the Absolute Competency of Civil Courts in Investigating Unlawful Actions Committed by the Government In Indonesia

“…Furthermore, if community members do not accept the resolution of objections by government agencies or officials, community members can submit an administrative appeal to superior officials. Decisions can be submitted for administrative appeal within ten working days of receiving the objection decision (Purnomo et al, 2020).…”

“…Meanwhile, the definition of government can be seen from a broad and narrow understanding. In a broad sense, government is all affairs carried out by the state to carry out the welfare of its people and the interests of the state itself, which can include executive, legislative, and judicial duties (Purnomo et al, 2020). In a narrow sense, the government includes implementing functions that carry out government (executive) tasks, which can be carried out by the cabinet and its apparatus from the same central to regional levels (Rumesten et al, 2023).…”

“…If an act is carried out within the competence and capacity of a government official, then the government bears responsibility. Purnomo et al, (2020), mentioned the elements that must be fulfilled in order for an action to be categorized as government action or deed, namely: a) The action was carried out by government officials in their position as rulers or as government equipment (bestuursorganen) with their initiative and responsibility; b) The act is carried out in the context of carrying out government functions; c) The action is intended as a means to give rise to legal consequences in the field of administrative law; d) The act in question was carried out in the context of maintaining the interests of the state and the people.…”

Juridical Study on Abuse of Authority in Corruption Crimes: Analysis of Law No. 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission

“…This paper aims to describe the criminal act of corruption, alleged abuse of the authority of a government official in the perspective of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, bearing in mind that after the regime of the law there has been a paradigm shift and fundamental changes related to efforts to examine whether or not there is an alleged abuse authority exercised by a public official/government. (Purnomo et al, 2020) Authority is a person's power to govern other people, a person's ability to control other people or groups. However, this authority is widely misused to seek wealth.…”

The Role of Financial Literature of SMEs in the Internationalization of Export Products

“…The theory views the internationalization of SMEs as an evolving stage. This stepwise approach has received criticisms such as those proposed by (Purnomo, Aisyah, Mulahela, & Nugraha, 2020). which states that the internationalization of SMEs with this approach is too deterministic.…”