2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2003.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of heterocyclic amines in food products: interlaboratory studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(27 reference statements)
3
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The complexity of the matrix made standard addition calibration necessary to obtain reliable results. Using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to ultraviolet detection or mass spectrometry, the standard deviation was generally below 10% and this is in agreement with results from other laboratories 33 . Analytical data on the content of MeIQx, PhIP and DiMeIQx (2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo [4,5-f ] quinoxaline) in samples cooked at 175 or 2008C were used in this study.…”
Section: Dietary Datasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The complexity of the matrix made standard addition calibration necessary to obtain reliable results. Using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to ultraviolet detection or mass spectrometry, the standard deviation was generally below 10% and this is in agreement with results from other laboratories 33 . Analytical data on the content of MeIQx, PhIP and DiMeIQx (2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo [4,5-f ] quinoxaline) in samples cooked at 175 or 2008C were used in this study.…”
Section: Dietary Datasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, in the next set of experiments, the samples were analyzed using HPLC (Spectra-Physics P2000; San JosØ, CA, USA) combined with a mass spectrometer (LCQ DECA ion-trap; ThermoFinnigan, San JosØ, CA, USA) as earlier described [26]. This method was also used in an intercalibration study on determination of HAs in food products [27]. The chromatographic conditions were: solvent A -water (pH adjusted to 3.5 with acetic acid)/acetonitrile, 95/5, and solvent Bwater (pH adjusted to 3.5 with acetic acid)/acetonitrile, 5/95.…”
Section: Identification and Quantification Of Hasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, SFE method offers advantages in eliminating the extensive clean-up process of extracts prior to the analyses, reducing the sample manipulation, costs and total extraction time (by nearly two-fold when compared with pressurized liquid extraction [41] and eight-fold compared to the conventional SPE technique [46]). The key role of the extractor is evident from different points of view: simplification and automation of the sample treatment with the possibility to include two sequential steps (clean-up of the sample and selective extraction of the analytes) by changing the carrier stream passing through the sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%