2008
DOI: 10.3133/pp175015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of GPS-measured deformation associated with the 2004-2006 dome-building eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington

Abstract: Detecting far-field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
69
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Volcanic deformation was detected at JRO1 at approximately the same time as the first seismic swarm, when the station began to move downward and radially inward towards the volcano consistent with the deflation of a mid-crustal magma reservoir (see Figure 4 and Lisowski et al [2008]). Deformation during the vent-clearing phase of the eruption (roughly the first 2-3 weeks) was rapid, at about 0.5 mm/day of inward motion, but slowed significantly ( Figure 4b) after an explosion on 5 October .…”
Section: Ground Deformation (Gps)mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Volcanic deformation was detected at JRO1 at approximately the same time as the first seismic swarm, when the station began to move downward and radially inward towards the volcano consistent with the deflation of a mid-crustal magma reservoir (see Figure 4 and Lisowski et al [2008]). Deformation during the vent-clearing phase of the eruption (roughly the first 2-3 weeks) was rapid, at about 0.5 mm/day of inward motion, but slowed significantly ( Figure 4b) after an explosion on 5 October .…”
Section: Ground Deformation (Gps)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Here only minor rates of chamber influx (at the end of the eruption) are predicted; the histogram in Figure 7f shows few values over 0.1 m 3 /sec, with a peak only a little higher than 10 -4 m 3 /sec. This suggests that chamber influx may have been relatively minor and was not necessary to explain observed differences between extruded volume and inferred volume change at depth [e.g., Lisowski et al, 2008].…”
Section: Inversion Of Gps and Extrusion Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alternatively, InSAR data could provide the short spatial scale surface deformation such as every coherence points within SAR images practically lacking in GPS data (Wei et al, 2010). In particular, the use of GPS devices in volcanoes is limited since the antenna is easily damaged by eruptions and weather conditions may affect data collection Lisowski et al, 2008). When comparing it to the InSAR technique s relatively longer data collection cycle, the GPS method is superior in that it can measure surface displacements at the time of eruption and collect three-dimensional locational information unlike InSAR that provides the LOS(Line-OfSight) directions of the displacement only (Larson et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%