1988
DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(88)90113-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of continuous-time Kalman filtering under incorrect noise covariances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. Before presenting Student's t-filter, we note that the effect of (partial) model misspecification as above to behaviour and stability of the Kalman filter has been studied for discrete-time systems in [26]- [30] and for continuous-time systems in [31].…”
Section: B the (Misspecified) Kalman Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Before presenting Student's t-filter, we note that the effect of (partial) model misspecification as above to behaviour and stability of the Kalman filter has been studied for discrete-time systems in [26]- [30] and for continuous-time systems in [31].…”
Section: B the (Misspecified) Kalman Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the CMs are either predetermined through extensive experimentation or are artificially inflated to adopt a conservative strategy. The case when inaccurate noise covariances are used is known to cause filter divergence [3,4,5,6,7,8]. These challenges motivate adaptive algorithms for state estimation while simultaneously estimating the noise CMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of these ad hoc inflation techniques, more sophisticated algorithms have also been developed [7][8][9]. The case when the noise covariance matrices are unknown has been shown to cause filter divergence [10][11][12][13][14][15]. These challenges associated with filter divergence provided motivation for the development of adaptive filtering algorithms that simultaneously estimate the system states along with the covariance matrices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%