2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and compensation of mass loading effect of accelerometers on tool point FRF measurements for chatter stability predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even using a low-weight accelerometer, the mass and the stiffness of the wire can influence the measurement of thin parts with high modal frequencies. Özsahin et al [46] obtained errors of the 10% in the natural frequency of a tool with a diameter of 12 mm and an overhang of 80 mm because of a mass of 2,5 gr from the accelerometer. This error is critical as it has a proportional effect in the stability diagram displacing the lobes horizontally and distorting the stable speeds selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even using a low-weight accelerometer, the mass and the stiffness of the wire can influence the measurement of thin parts with high modal frequencies. Özsahin et al [46] obtained errors of the 10% in the natural frequency of a tool with a diameter of 12 mm and an overhang of 80 mm because of a mass of 2,5 gr from the accelerometer. This error is critical as it has a proportional effect in the stability diagram displacing the lobes horizontally and distorting the stable speeds selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subscript ' m ' denotes an experimentally obtained FRF. The influence of sensor mass loading on the measured FRF was compensated using the structural modification method [12]. Figure 3 shows the measured and predicted tip FRFs for a tool holder with two 16 mm carbide blanks with overhangs of 60 mm and 100 mm.…”
Section: Joint Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the OMA, there is a significant issue regarding "noise" (or spurious) modes, and distinguishing them from physical modes still remains to be solved. There is also a problem associated with measurement techniques and the influences of the selection of signal processing on experimental results [22][23][24]. Thus, it is necessary to consider the electrical noise sources in measurement to avoid a bad signal-to-noise ratio and complexity for data analysis, which can cause a severe error in damping estimation [13].…”
Section: Sensitivity To Noisementioning
confidence: 99%