Analysing affects and emotions in tourist e-mail interviews: a case in post-disaster Tohoku, Japan

Abstract

This paper contributes methodological discussions on collecting and analysing international tourists' affects and emotions. The method of data collection used is electronic mail interviews, in some instances corroborated by participant observation in the field, whereas the methods of data analysis employed are affective mapping and emotionality of texts. Such methods of analysis capture the on-flow and contingency of the tourist's experience in post-disaster places. E-mail interviews are becoming an increasingly widespread method of data collection. In post-disaster contexts, the potential of email interviews allows researchers to conduct fieldwork even when they cannot obtain face-to-face interviews, or in cases in which participants feel more at ease answering from their home and can take their time to respond. Twelve semi-structured e-mail interviews have been conducted in 2016 with international tourists who visited the Tohoku region, Japan, hit in 2011 by a triple disaster: an earthquake, a tsunami, and a nuclear meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear power plant. To explore and better understand participants' affective and emotional experiences, we exemplify affective mapping and emotionality of texts drawing on tools like linguistic features of e-mails, imagework, short stories and anecdotes.

Dark tourism and affect: framing places of death and disaster

“…Alongside dark tourism research on supply and demand approaches, case studies, tourists' motivations and trends (see Light, 2017, for a comprehensive overview), researchers currently turn their attention to future possibilities for dark tourism, such as 'terror parks' (Wright, 2018), as well as to psychological and psychoanalytical approaches to tourists' experiences in dark places (Biran & Buda, 2018;Buda, 2015b;Korstanje & Ivanov, 2012;Morten, Stone, & Jarratt, 2018). A considerable body of work, in particular, explores post-disaster tourism places, recognizing the emotional, subjective and specific value of these sites (Amujo & Otubanjo, 2012;Chew & Jahari, 2014;Mair, Ritchie, & Walters, 2016;Martini & Buda, 2018;Tucker, Shelton, & Bae, 2017;Wright & Sharpley, 2018).…”

Case Study as a Research Method in Hospitality and Tourism Research: A Systematic Literature Review (1974–2020)

“…For qualitative case studies, use of content analysis as a data treatment technique was most prevalent (e.g., Paget et al, 2010; Peters & Kallmuenzer, 2018) which is followed by thematic analysis (e.g., Marschall, 2017) and discourse analysis, respectively (see Burns & Cowlishaw, 2014; Cui et al, 2020). More interestingly, an increasing number of innovative data analysis techniques were recently used in quantitative case studies such as affective mapping and emotinality of texts (Martini & Buda, 2019), along with computer-assisted data analysis software (see Chan & Hawkins, 2010; Lacey et al, 2012; Li & Ryan, 2018; Scott et al, 2008).…”

Humour: coping with travel bans during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…For example, health crises like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and bird flu required a-two years period to reach the post-recovery stage (United Nation World Organization, 2020), but the early stages of climate change have taken longer to recognise due to the high level of uncertainty (Gössling and Hall, 2006). Further, there are differences in risk awareness (Rittichainuwat et al , 2018), trust (Volo and Pardew, 2013) and emotional responses are dynamic and change over crises stages (Martini and Buda, 2019). Most research has studied the post-recovery stage (Mair et al , 2016) or the peak of the emergency phase (Scott et al , 2008).…”