Humour: coping with travel bans during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to extend the use of psychology in the field of tourism crisis and disaster management using coping theory. It examines how resident emotions change in the extended prodromal stage of the COVID-19 pandemic and how residents used humour to cope with stress from not being able to travel. Design/methodology/approach Early COVID-19 (March–April 2020) was characterised by negative media reports, lockdowns and travel restrictions but for Indonesia, no direct effects in terms of loss of life. This unusual context has led to phenomena not previously studied – humour as a coping strategy. This research consists of two studies: Study 1 used thematic analysis of interviews before and during the early lockdown period with a panel of 245 quarantined residents who had travelled in the prior two years. Study 2 followed up using a #hasthtag analysis of travel-related videos content posted on Instagram and TikTok. Findings The COVID-19 global pandemic is an unusual crisis which has resulted in high levels of stress and uncertainty. This study identified the unusual characteristics of the COVID-19 crises and changes of quarantined resident’s emotions during the pre-event and prodromal stages. In addition, this study found the use of humour as a coping mechanism during the lockdown period and the use of social media as the vehicle for humour. Research limitations/implications These findings may be generalisable only to a crises and disasters with an extended prodromal stage. Interestingly, climate change has some similar characteristics where warning signs are available, but the personal implications have not yet become apparent. Practical implications The emotions associated with crisis are dynamic and crisis managers may tailor communication to help deal with stress. Social implications This research provides an insight into how humorous content can be used to reduce negative emotions in the early stage of a stressful event associated with travel restrictions. This study may be suitable for use in integrated marketing communication in post-recovery messaging for the tourism industry and destination management organisation in the digital platform. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate “dark humour” during the early stages of COVID-19 and also the use of coping strategies to explain how humour can reduce stress.

A pentadic analysis of TikTok marketing in tourism: The case of Penang, Malaysia

“…This is exemplified in the description for a competition entry by siennylovesdraw, ‘#Now #stayhome #planning #JomExperiencePenang #trip ~ #food #culture #heritage #arts & enjoy #Penang TauSarPneah @experiencepenang #traveller #travel’. As such, the entertainment value and social effect of TikTok videos make the contents an attractive medium to formulate desired agency outcomes for a tourist destination such as Penang, offering virtual and vicarious consumption of visitor experiences, amidst a global pandemic (Lenggogeni et al, 2022). Finally, it is again important to note that influencers, and to a certain extent, competition entrants were themselves involved in the Act which was presented to their audience, emphasising their participation in the activities they performed.…”

Pengembangan Dark Tourism Sebagai Salah Satu Daya Tarik Wisata Tana Toraja

“…Peneliti ini merupakan pengembangan dari riset dilakukan oleh (de-Miguel-Molina, 2020; Lenggogeni et al, 2021;Seccardini & Desmoulins, 2023). Penelitian tersebut menegaskan pentingnya menyusun kebijakan strategi yang terarah serta sejalan dengan pembangunan pariwisata.…”

Medical device companies crisis communication response to stakeholders during COVID-19: pre-crisis stage to new normal

“…As a result, interacting with stakeholders is always considered sensitive in situations like COVID. The research in this area is limited and choosing whether to communicate with humour or empathy is a challenging decision that demands an evaluation of marketing communication (Lenggogeni et al , 2022; Pedersen et al , 2020; Saroj and Pal, 2020). Furthermore, the present marketing communication literature lacks the emotions, sentiments and phase-wise crisis management method that have been addressed in the current study (Koehler and Raithel, 2018; Lenggogeni et al , 2022; Oltra González et al , 2021; Pedersen et al , 2020).…”