2019
DOI: 10.29244/jitl.19.1.25-31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analisis Respon Hidrologi Dan Simulasi Teknik Konservasi Tanah Dan Air Sub Das Cimanuk Hulu

Abstract: <p>DAS Cimanuk hulu merupakan salah satu DAS yang prioritas di Jawa Barat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis berbagai skenario penggunaan lahan untuk memperbaiki aliran dasar dan aliran lateral. Analisis menggunakan Model Hidrologi SWAT. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kinerja model mampu memprediksi debit aliran dengan nilai NSE 0.56 (memuaskan) dan R<sup>2</sup> 0.70. Ada empat skenario  yang  akan dianalisis. Aliran dasar dan aliran lateral terbaik berasal dari  skenario pertam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At Ciliman Watershed (Banten Province), the application of SWC reduced FRC, AFC, and direct runoff by 31.6%, 24%, and 23.6%, respectively, and increased base flow and water yield by 16.2% and 1.8%, respectively [64]. The application of SWC at upper Cimanuk Watershed (West Java) reduced the flow regime coefficient, reduced runoff by 40.8%, and increased lateral flow by 536.9 mm [65]. At the upper Opak Watershed, the application of SWC was able to reduce runoff by 27.1%, increase base flow by 18.3%, and improve FRC and AFC values [56]; meanwhile, at the upper Cisadane Watershed, SWC reduced runoff [58].…”
Section: Impact On Runoffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Ciliman Watershed (Banten Province), the application of SWC reduced FRC, AFC, and direct runoff by 31.6%, 24%, and 23.6%, respectively, and increased base flow and water yield by 16.2% and 1.8%, respectively [64]. The application of SWC at upper Cimanuk Watershed (West Java) reduced the flow regime coefficient, reduced runoff by 40.8%, and increased lateral flow by 536.9 mm [65]. At the upper Opak Watershed, the application of SWC was able to reduce runoff by 27.1%, increase base flow by 18.3%, and improve FRC and AFC values [56]; meanwhile, at the upper Cisadane Watershed, SWC reduced runoff [58].…”
Section: Impact On Runoffmentioning
confidence: 99%