Análisis factorial confirmatorio de la versión española del cuestionario Effort-Reward Imbalance, de medida del estrés laboral

Fernández-López, Juan Antonio; Martín-Payo, Rubén; Fidalgo, M. Fernández; Rödel, Andreas

doi:10.1157/13094809

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Job strain was measured with a shortened version of the Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire (Niedhammer et al, 2004;Fernandez-Lopez et al, 2006;Siegrist et al, 2009). 1 Job-related efforts were assessed with four items covering workload and time pressure at work, work interruption/disturbance, responsibility in one's job, and overtime work.…”

Section: Job Strainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is Burnout Primarily Linked to Work-Situated Factors? A Relative Weight Analytic Study

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It has often been asserted that burnout is primarily linked to occupational-context factors, and only secondarily to individual-level (e.g., personality) and non-work (or general) factors. We evaluated the validity of this view by examining the links between burnout and an array of 22 work-situated (effort-reward imbalance, unreasonable work tasks, unnecessary work tasks, weekly working hours, job autonomy, skill development, performance feedback, and support in work life), work-unrelated (sentimental accomplishment, familial accomplishment, number of child[ren], leisure activities, residential satisfaction, environmental quality, security in daily life, and support in personal life), dispositional (neuroticism, sex, age, and physical condition), and intersecting (work–non-work conflict and non-work–work conflict) variables. The study involved schoolteachers from three different countries: France (N = 4,395), Spain (N = 611), and Switzerland (N = 514). Burnout was assessed with the Maslach Burnout Inventory for Educators. Most of our predictors were assessed based on widely used measures (e.g., neuroticism was assessed with the NEO-Five Factor Inventory). In order to assess sentimental accomplishment and familial accomplishment, we created two self-reported measures, namely, the Sentimental Accomplishment Inventory (SAI; 9 items) and the Familial Accomplishment Inventory (FAI; 9 items). The SAI and the FAI both showed strong reliability and high factorial validity. Exploratory structural equation modeling bifactor analysis and Mokken scaling suggested that both instruments could be considered essentially unidimensional. The study results showed that neuroticism, job strain, skill development, security in daily life, and work–non-work conflict were consistently associated with burnout across the three samples. Sample-specific predictors of burnout included sex, age, unreasonable work tasks, weekly working hours, job autonomy, support in work life, sentimental accomplishment, leisure activities, support in personal life, and non-work–work conflict. Relative weight analysis indicated that neuroticism was the best predictor of burnout in each sample. Our findings suggest that burnout’s nomological network may not be primarily job-related. We conclude that the tendency to de-emphasize individual-level and non-work factors in burnout research is unwise. This tendency may constitute a roadblock in the development of effective interventional strategies. The implications of our findings for burnout’s conceptual status are discussed. The neuroticism-burnout link should be further examined in longitudinal studies.

show abstract

Section: Job Strainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is Burnout Primarily Linked to Work-Situated Factors? A Relative Weight Analytic Study

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Se realizó un análisis factorial confirmatorio (AFC) para comprobar la estructura del modelo, el cual parte de una teoría preestablecida que se aplica para determinar la composición y la relación entre ítems y factores; dicha técnica corrige algunas deficiencias propias que pueden encontrarse en la perspectiva exploratoria (Fernández-López et al, 2006;Herrero, 2010;Lloret-Segura et al, 2014). Para garantizar un ajuste de calidad del modelo se emplearon los siguientes índices de bondad de ajuste de Hair et al (2018) y Ruiz et al (2010: Chi-cuadrado sobre los grados de libertad (χ2/gl < 3), Error de aproximación cuadrático medio (RMSEA < .05), Residuo cuadrático medio estandarizado (SRMR < .08), Índice de bondad de ajuste (GFI > .95), Índice de ajuste comparativo (CFI > .95) e Índice de Tuker-Lewis (TLI > .95).…”

Section: Análisis De Los Datosunclassified

Validación del cuestionario de aprendizaje autorregulado [CAA] en estudiantes universitarios

Rocha-Durand,

Mamani-Ramos,

Damian-Nuñez

2023

rev. peru. investig. innov. educ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El aprendizaje autorregulado es útil para toda la vida, ya que garantiza el éxito. El objetivo del estudio fue analizar las propiedades psicométricas del “cuestionario de aprendizaje autorregulado” (CAA) en estudiantes universitarios de pregrado. Se realizó un estudio de tipo descriptivo con corte transversal, cuya muestra fue seleccionada mediante un muestreo de tipo probabilístico. Se aplicó el instrumento CAA en 215 estudiantes universitarios de la especialidad de enfermería (39 hombres y 176 mujeres) de Lima, Perú, con edades comprendidas entre 15 y 47 años (M = 24.00; DT = 7.19). Se procedió con un análisis factorial confirmatorio para analizar los índices de ajuste y cargas factoriales, y un análisis de consistencia interna en el que se empleó el coeficiente Omega (ω). Los resultados muestran índices de ajuste adecuados (χ2/gl=1.37; RMSEA=.042; SRMR=.061; GFI=.994; CFI=.987; TLI=.993); además, las cargas factoriales resultantes también fueron adecuadas (.45 y .80). En cuanto al análisis de consistencia interna, el cuestionario mostró una adecuada fiabilidad a nivel general (ω = .92). Estos resultados evidencian validez y confiabilidad del CAA; en consecuencia, el cuestionario puede ser utilizado en estudiantes universitarios de pregrado.

show abstract

“…Job demands are frequently responsible for instigating job stress in personnel, whereas job resources are attributed to decreasing the effect of job demands in causing job stress amongst other contributing effects (Fernandez-Lopez et al, 2006). JD-R is adopted to discuss the influence of job demands and resources on job pressure because every job may possess its own precise risk factors related to job strain (Fernandez-Lopez et al, 2006).…”

Section: Job Demands-resources Model and Job Stressmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…JD-R is adopted to discuss the influence of job demands and resources on job pressure because every job may possess its own precise risk factors related to job strain (Fernandez-Lopez et al, 2006). For example, professional levels of quantitative and emotional job demands were originally causally related with high levels of job strain (Mintz-Binder & Sanders, 2012).…”

Section: Job Demands-resources Model and Job Stressmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Karasek & Theorell (1990) determined that psychosocial job demands along with time pressure and conflicts are also significant sources of risk for stress-related illnesses (Lindholm, 2006). Job assets or job resources are associated with the capability to decrease the effect of job demands that lead to job stress and other destructive effects (Fernandez-Lopez et al, 2006). Hackman & Oldham (1980) proposed that job characteristics increase the sense of responsibility of an employee.…”

Section: Job Demands-resources Model and Job Stressmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Job Stress in Journalism: Interaction between Organisational Support and Job Demands–Resources Model

Muala¹

2017

JMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to analyse the impact of job demands and job resources on job stress among journalists in Jordan. In addition, the moderation effect of organisational support on such relationship is assessed in this research. A questionnaire survey was conducted among journalists working in daily newspapers in Jordan. This study used multiple and hierarchical regression analyses and determined a significant and positive relationship amongst emotional demands, job insecurity, and task significance on job stress. Additionally, organisational support moderated the relationship between task significance and job stress. Results of study revealed that the organisational support moderates the relationship between task significance and job stress. This finding could challenge journalists, newspaper managements and decision-makers in Jordan. When journalists work on sensitive topics and are in conflict areas, they are in need of additional support from newspaper managements to mitigate high job stress and motivate them to produce quality work.

show abstract

Análisis factorial confirmatorio de la versión española del cuestionario Effort-Reward Imbalance, de medida del estrés laboral

Cited by 11 publications

References 6 publications

Is Burnout Primarily Linked to Work-Situated Factors? A Relative Weight Analytic Study

Is Burnout Primarily Linked to Work-Situated Factors? A Relative Weight Analytic Study

Validación del cuestionario de aprendizaje autorregulado [CAA] en estudiantes universitarios

Job Stress in Journalism: Interaction between Organisational Support and Job Demands–Resources Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About