Abstract:A matéria publicada neste periódico é licenciada sob forma de uma Licença Creative Commons -Atribuição 4.
ABSTRACT
Analysis by Rasch Model of ADAPE Dictation: Considerations from OrthographyThis study aimed to identify the most difficult words, based on the Rasch model analysis, and indicate specific word compositions from the ADAPE dictation that produce more errors. Participants were 221 students, aged between 6 and 11 years, from the second to fifth grade of a private school in the State of Minas Gerais. T… Show more
“…The list of noun phrases was adequate for the evaluation of the writing of the total sample, which was confirmed by the configurational and scalar invariance analyses ( Table 3), whose TLI and CFI showed good fit of the model to the sample (X 2 (15) =16.801 (p=0.3309) (21) . Although it was expected that the list would evaluate the same writing abilities of each investigated school year, it was necessary to group the initial (2 nd and 3 rd grades) and the final (4 th and 5 th grades) years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Some orthographic writing assessments present evidence of construct validation. However, it is necessary to collect direct psychometric measures on test scores, in the form of validation, reliability and analysis of the items, which is not often found in Brazilian studies (21,22) .…”
Purpose Prepare a list of noun phrases able to characterize the writing performance of schoolchildren according to school year. Methods A list of 25 noun phrases intended for dictation was prepared and applied to 275 Elementary School students (2nd to 5thgrades). The unidimensionality underlying the proposed items was analyzed using Item Response Theory. Results The list enabled differentiation between the performance of schoolchildren attending the 2nd and 3rd years and that of students attending the 4 th and 5th years. Items on the list presented moderate difficulty level and medium discrimination capacity. Conclusion The model showed good fit and was able to differentiate the performance of 2nd to 3rd grade students from that of 4th to 5thgrade students. The list of noun phrases assessed writing in 4th to 5th grade students more accurately.
“…The list of noun phrases was adequate for the evaluation of the writing of the total sample, which was confirmed by the configurational and scalar invariance analyses ( Table 3), whose TLI and CFI showed good fit of the model to the sample (X 2 (15) =16.801 (p=0.3309) (21) . Although it was expected that the list would evaluate the same writing abilities of each investigated school year, it was necessary to group the initial (2 nd and 3 rd grades) and the final (4 th and 5 th grades) years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Some orthographic writing assessments present evidence of construct validation. However, it is necessary to collect direct psychometric measures on test scores, in the form of validation, reliability and analysis of the items, which is not often found in Brazilian studies (21,22) .…”
Purpose Prepare a list of noun phrases able to characterize the writing performance of schoolchildren according to school year. Methods A list of 25 noun phrases intended for dictation was prepared and applied to 275 Elementary School students (2nd to 5thgrades). The unidimensionality underlying the proposed items was analyzed using Item Response Theory. Results The list enabled differentiation between the performance of schoolchildren attending the 2nd and 3rd years and that of students attending the 4 th and 5th years. Items on the list presented moderate difficulty level and medium discrimination capacity. Conclusion The model showed good fit and was able to differentiate the performance of 2nd to 3rd grade students from that of 4th to 5thgrade students. The list of noun phrases assessed writing in 4th to 5th grade students more accurately.
“…In this sense, Morais (2007) states that the use of forms that represent the nasal sound are a complicating factor when writing skills are being acquired because, in the Portuguese language, the nasal sound can be represented by m or n at the end of a syllable (e.g., bamboo [bamboo] (Caliatto & Fernandes, 2014). Even though the objective of this study was not to point out the type of errors children most frequently made, based on the aforementioned authors, these were the main possibilities of error for the most difficult syllables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this subtest reveal that the most difficult words required accents (régua [rule], relógio [watch] and história [history]) but also required the children to master other rules for its correct graphic representation, such as properly choosing between g or j in the case of relógio [watch] and using a silent h at the beginning of the word história [history]. This subtest can be compared to that of the study conducted by Caliatto and Fernandes (2014). They also used the Rasch model to estimate the difficulty level of dictated words and discuss the linguistic complexity presented by the most difficulty words.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, orthography plays an important role in this notation system, as it systematizes the way each word is written in Portuguese. Even though the alphabet has a limited number of letters and signs and orthographic norms regulates this system, mastering this notation system has proven to be a much more complex task than one might suppose (Nunes and Bryant, 2014), which has motivated researchers to conduct studies to analyze and intervene in children's writing (Zorzi, 1998;Santos & Maluf, 2010;Batista & Capellini, 2011;Capellini, et al, 2011;Rosa Neto, Xavier, & Santos, 2013;Caliatto & Fernandes, 2014), among other topics of study.…”
RESUMENEste estudio tuvo como objetivo averiguar los principales tipos de error en las palabras más difí-ciles, según el análisis por el modelo de Rasch, de la Escala de Reconocimiento de Palabras. Participaron de la investigación 701 estudiantes de escuelas públicas y particulares del interior del Estado de São Paulo en Brasil, siendo 362 de sexo femenino (52%). Para la identificación de los ítems más difíciles fue realizada la estimación de los parámetros de dificultad de los ítems con el uso del modelo de Rasch y obtenidas las frecuencias y porcentajes de las tres opciones de respuesta de esos ítems. Los resultados indicaron que la palabra más difícil de la Escala fue "exemplo", seguida de la palabra "informação". El parámetro de la habilidad media de los estudiantes fue -0,12 logit, inferior al resto de las diez palabras. El análisis por tipo de errores indicó dos características principales para la escritura ortográfica, el apoyo en la oralidad, principalmente, y el apoyo en caracterís-ticas visuales de la escritura. De acuerdo con la literatura, esos tipos de errores son comunes entre los niños al comienzo de la adquisición de la escritura, pero deberían ser superados conforme aumenta la familiaridad con el sistema alfabético y ortográfico de la lengua. Se discute que los datos obtenidos en las evaluaciones de ortografía indican la necesidad y la importancia de las intervenciones planeadas y puntuales en diferentes años escolares y suscitan la profundización de las investigaciones acerca de la superación del analfabetismo en Brasil.Palabras clave: ortografía, evaluación, psicología educacional.
ABSTRACTThe aim of this study was to investigate the main kinds of mistake regarding the most difficult words, according to the analysis by Rasch's model of Scale of Words Recognition. 701 students from private and public schools located in the countryside of the State of São Paulo, in Brazil, being 362 from the feminine gender (52%), participated in this research. To identify the most difficult
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.