Análise de Risco Adversário para alocação de recursos de contraterrorismo

Zawadzki, Marcelo; Costa, Andre N.; Belderrain, Mischel Carmen Neyra; Montibeller, Gilberto

doi:10.1590/0104-530x1814-16

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Risk Assessment And The Prevention Of Radicalization From Nonviolence Into Terrorism (Sarma, 2017). Adversarial Risk Analysis in support of defensive resource allocation for counterterrorism (Zawadzki, et al, 2017). Rationality Of Terrorist Acts, Counterterrorism And Risk Analysis (Pavlićević, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk Analysis of Islamic State (IS) Network Development in Southeast Asia Based on 3D Matrix

Octavian¹,

Widjayanto²,

Putra³

et al. 2021

ijoqm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The threat of terror in Southeast Asia has been currently divided into three generations of terror: Al-Qaeda terror network, ISIS terror network and IS terror network.This study aims at providing a risk analysis on the development of the Islamic State network in Southeast Asia. This study employed Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach, TOPSIS. The AHP method is used to give weight to risk identification criteria. The TOPSIS method is used to provide the value analysis of threats, vulnerability, and impact in order to determine the threat-based risk level assessment, vulnerability, and the impact of the TOPSIS calculation results. The risk analysis of the development of Islamic State in Southeast Asia resulted three countries were categorized in the category of Low: Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. Indonesia has the value of risk factor of 0.170; Malaysia has the value of risk factor of 0.088 and Thailand has the value of risk factor of 0.176. On the other hand, the Philippines has the value of risk factor of 0.351 in the category of Guarded.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%