2014
DOI: 10.21168/rega.v11n2.p37-51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análise comparativa entre a cobrança pelo uso da água bruta do estado do Ceará com a cobrança aplicada no estado de São Paulo

Abstract: Comparative analysis between charging for the use of raw water in the state of Ceará and charging applied in the state of São Paulo Marcus Vinícius Sousa Rodrigues Marisete Dantas de Aquino RESUMO: Os modelos de gerenciamento das águas no Brasil definem a água como um bem natural escasso e dotado de valor econômico, adotando como instrumento a cobrança pelo uso da água. Dentre os instrumentos de gestão dos recursos hídricos se destacam a cobrança e a outorga de direito do uso da água. Atualmente, os Estados do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…11,996/92, which established this economic instrument and anticipated the Federation to enact the raw water charges in the Water Law, that is, Federal Law No. 9,433/97 (Rodrigues and Aquino, 2014). However, in 1996, charges were initiated for only three categories of users: industries; potable water service concessionaires; and users that receive pressurized, pumped, or channeled water.…”
Section: Resolution N°02 Statementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,996/92, which established this economic instrument and anticipated the Federation to enact the raw water charges in the Water Law, that is, Federal Law No. 9,433/97 (Rodrigues and Aquino, 2014). However, in 1996, charges were initiated for only three categories of users: industries; potable water service concessionaires; and users that receive pressurized, pumped, or channeled water.…”
Section: Resolution N°02 Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Massarutto (2007) and Pinto & Marques (2016) suggested that opportunity costs and economic externalities should be considered in addition to the supply and O&M costs to fully recover the economic costs, also it is possible to add the environmental dimension for a full cost recovery. Lago et al (2015) and Rodrigues & Aquino (2014) suggested that the water charge should encompass nobler objectives such as a more rational use and the acquisition of management and investment resources, especially in less developed semi-arid regions, such as the State of Ceará, in which the water potential can only be realized through management and investment in water storage and transfer. Based on our case study, the water charges in Ceará are mainly used to cover O&M costs, without much success, and the investments can be considered as sunk costs.…”
Section: System Operation Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apesar de durante muito tempo a Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH) ter considerado que a cobrança pelo uso da água seria a solução para a crise hidrológica durante seus eventos, recentemente, sua visão tem sido mais crítica, no sentido de que esse é apenas mais um instrumento de colaboração com os objetivos e fundamentos da Política Nacional de Recursos Hídricos, e que por si só não é suficiente para resolver os problemas da água (CAMPOS et al, 2015;RODRIGUES et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussão Teóricaunclassified
“…Conforme Rodrigues;Aquino (2014), "os usos considerados no Estado para a cobrança pela água bruta são: indústria, abastecimento público, irrigação, piscicultura, carcinicultura, água mineral e potável de mesa, e demais usos".…”
Section: Equação (1)unclassified