2007
DOI: 10.3742/opem.2007.7.1.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analgesic and antipyretic actions of Muntingia calabura leaves chloroform extract in animal models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vernacular names of M. calabura in various countries are given in Table 1. This might explain why M. calabura medicinal value is not well documented in Malaysia and why it is considered as a neglected plant (Zakaria et al, 2006a(Zakaria et al, , 2007a. Despite the lack of traditional claims, various parts of the plant have been used to treat different types of illnesses.…”
Section: Traditional Usesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The vernacular names of M. calabura in various countries are given in Table 1. This might explain why M. calabura medicinal value is not well documented in Malaysia and why it is considered as a neglected plant (Zakaria et al, 2006a(Zakaria et al, , 2007a. Despite the lack of traditional claims, various parts of the plant have been used to treat different types of illnesses.…”
Section: Traditional Usesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A year later, another report on the antinociceptive activity of M. calabura leaves was released (Zakaria et al, 2007a). This time, the leaves were collected between July and August, 2005 from Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia, and prepared as CEMC L , in the concentrations of 10, 50, and 100% strength.…”
Section: Antinociceptive Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A reduction in the writhing number compared to the control group was considered as evidence for the presence of analgesia, which was expressed as percent inhibition of writhing. Data were calculated according to the formula: A -B/A ×100 Where A = mean number of writhes produced by the control groups, and B = mean number of writhes produced by the test groups (Nunez-Guillen et al, 1997;Chattopadhyay et al, 2005b;Zakaria et al, 2007).…”
Section: Acetic Acid-induced Writhing Testmentioning
confidence: 99%