2019
DOI: 10.1109/tcsii.2019.2921889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Untrimmed BJT-Based Temperature Sensor With Dynamic Current-Gain Compensation in 55-nm CMOS Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The considerable spread of the untrimmed case and the residual error of the one-point offset-compensated one are mainly due to the mismatch effects of the several current mirrors employed within the sensor's design. This condition could have been improved by introducing chopping or dynamic element matching (DEM) techniques which are commonly used in this field [39], [40], [41], [42]; however, no effort was spent in this direction since the achieved accuracy performance, although modest with respect to other the state-of-the-art BJT-based solutions, is compliant with the application taken into account. As stated in the Introduction, the accuracy of this temperature sensor is at some point bottlenecked by the uncertainty of the outputs of the inertial sensors to be compensated; for this reason, a 2% accuracy in a 160 °C temperature range is considered sufficient.…”
Section: Temperature Inaccuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The considerable spread of the untrimmed case and the residual error of the one-point offset-compensated one are mainly due to the mismatch effects of the several current mirrors employed within the sensor's design. This condition could have been improved by introducing chopping or dynamic element matching (DEM) techniques which are commonly used in this field [39], [40], [41], [42]; however, no effort was spent in this direction since the achieved accuracy performance, although modest with respect to other the state-of-the-art BJT-based solutions, is compliant with the application taken into account. As stated in the Introduction, the accuracy of this temperature sensor is at some point bottlenecked by the uncertainty of the outputs of the inertial sensors to be compensated; for this reason, a 2% accuracy in a 160 °C temperature range is considered sufficient.…”
Section: Temperature Inaccuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to earlier work from [6,14] with a similar ADC, this implementation has a few advantages: The modulation is performed by switching of a single series-resistor, where the measurement range can be freely adjusted by the R2/R1-ratio. Since resistors show generally better matching than current mirrors (at equal area), there is no dynamic element matching (DEM) required like for a current-DAC.…”
Section: Basic Sensor Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more precise model of ( 4) can be obtained by considering the two different noise sources. One is the approximation error ε that is defined in (7). Another one is the sensor noise during temperature measurements.…”
Section: Temperature Sensor Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the DTM technique uses on-chip temperature sensors to obtain the full thermal field details of a chip [7,8]. Ideally, a precise full-chip thermal field could be achieved directly from temperature sensor measurements by allocating a large number of sensors on the chip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%