An Overview of the Evolution of Agricultural Cooperatives in Québec

Doyon, Maurice

doi:10.1111/j.1744-7976.2002.tb00351.x

Cited by 12 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 3 publications

(2 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Fourth, they foster and strengthen social capital thereby enhancing the underlying civil society within the community (Mutersbaugh, 2002;Holford, Aktouf, & Ebrahimi, 2008;Simmons & Birchall, 2008;Liang, Huang, Lu, & Wang, 2015). Fifth, the co-operative principles outlined in Table 1 encourage community participation and collaboration, and thereby offer more resilient business structures (Doyon, 2002;Birchall, 2013;Sonnino & Griggs-Trevarthen, 2013;Ketilson, 2014;Sabatini, Modena, & Tortia, 2014).…”

Section: Cmes the Social Economy And Social Entrepreneurshipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing a conceptual framework for the co-operative and mutual enterprise business model

Mazzarol

Clark

Reboud

et al. 2018

Journal of Management & Organization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The co-operative and mutual enterprise business model represents a unique type of organisation that has a dual purpose focused on both economic and social goals. For nearly two centuries it has played an important role in economic development, job creation and addressing market failures. However, despite its potential importance to economic development it has been largely ignored within the mainstream economics and management literature. This paper provides an overview of the nature of the co-operative and mutual enterprise business model and also proposes a business model framework or ‘canvas’ that can be used for research, teaching and strategic analysis.

show abstract

Section: Cmes the Social Economy And Social Entrepreneurshipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing a conceptual framework for the co-operative and mutual enterprise business model

Mazzarol

Clark

Reboud

et al. 2018

Journal of Management & Organization

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…I fully agree. If, for example, the processors in the dairy supply chain are managing consumer demand as argued by Doyon (), it could erode some of the consumer gains estimated by Cardwell et al () from lower food prices expected from the dismantling of the Canadian supply managed sector. Concerns about market power could also impact estimates of the gain in innovation if the life science sector is an oligopoly and the likelihood of them competing to the cost of innovation is low.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Competition in Canada's Agricultural Value Chains: The Case of Grain

Brewin

2016

Canadian J Agri Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To open this address, I would like to advocate for membership in the Canadian Agricultural Economics Society (CAES). The fact that applied economics offers theory and methods that help us address topics as diverse as the Canadian grain value chain and the economics of species at risk speaks well for the future of our discipline. There is a vast array of work for us to do. Membership in the CAES offers an excellent link to the most up‐to‐date research in this area through our journal and conferences. Every society I attend inspires me to examine my own research and look at problems in new ways using new tools I learned from presentations made by the members of CAES. The main message of my address is to promote the application of Game Theory strategies as a way to understand behavior in the grain value chain. These tools are already being applied in areas as different as optimizing tradable systems of environmental goods and assessing competitive behavior in beef packing. Tout d'abord, je tiens à mentionner que j'appuie l'adhésion à la Société canadienne d'agroéconomie (SCAE). Le fait que l’économie appliquée offre la théorie et les méthodes qui nous aident à examiner des sujets aussi variés que la chaîne de valeur des grains du Canada et l’économie des espèces en péril augure bien pour l'avenir de notre discipline. La diversité du travail à accomplir est immense. Être membre de la SCAE procure un lien privilégié à la recherche de pointe grâce à notre Revue et à nos conférences. Aujourd'hui, mon message vise principalement à promouvoir l'application des stratégies de la théorie des jeux pour comprendre le comportement au sein de la chaîne de valeur des grains. Certains domaines, tels que l'optimisation des systèmes d’échange des biens environnementaux et l’évaluation du comportement concurrentiel dans le secteur du conditionnement du bœuf, utilisent déjà ces outils. La panoplie d'outils à notre disposition est mise en valeur dans notre Revue et lors de nos congrès. Tous les congrès auxquels j'assiste me motivent à examiner ma propre recherche et à analyser les problèmes sous un angle différent grâce aux nouveaux outils mis au point et présentés par les membres de la SCAE.

show abstract

“…Buna karşın, incelenen birliklerin bölgedeki diğer tarımsal örgütler, MB, GTHB ve üniversite ile ilişkilerin güçlü olmadığı ifade edilebilir. Doyon (2002), tarımsal kooperatifler ile üretici birliklerinin çıkar çatışması içerisinde olmalarına rağmen, pazarlama zincirinin önemli bir halkası olarak tarımsal kooperatifler ile üretici birliklerinin diğer tarım paydaşlarıyla birbirlerini tamamlayacaklarını belirtmektedirler. Acar ve Yıldırım (2000) ise kooperatifler ile üniversite arasında kurulacak güçlü bir ilişki, onların tanınmaları ve itibarlarının artırılmasına önemli katkılar sağlayabileceğini belirtmektedir.…”

Section: Tüb'lerinin Finansal Performans Endeksiunclassified

Performance measurement in the agricultural producer unions

Topuz¹,

Bozoğlu²

2016

Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Araştırmanın temel amacı, Samsun İlindeki Tarımsal Üretici Birliklerinin (TÜB) örgütsel performanslarının belirlenmesidir. Araştırmanın ana materyalini, Samsun İlinden seçilen 14 TÜB yöneticilerinden anket yöntemiyle elde edilen veriler oluşturmaktadır. Birliklerin performansı, finansal ve finansal olmayan 22 değişkene göre oluşturulan performans endeksiyle, performansa etkili faktörler ise korelasyon analizine göre belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada ortalama olarak birliklerin finansal performans endeksi %42.5, finansal olmayan performans endeksi %47.7 toplam performans endeksi ise %43.5 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Birliklerin finansal performansı açısından en güçlü oldukları faktör üyelik aidatının ödenmesi iken, en zayıf oldukları faktör ise birliğe yapılan bağış, fon ve yardımlardır. Finansal olmayan değişkenler açısından birliklerin en güçlü olduğu faktör çevresel sürdürülebilirliğe katkı iken, en zayıf oldukları faktör ise yöneticilerin tarımsal örgütlenme eğitimine katılma durumlarıdır. Bitkisel alanda faaliyet gösteren birliklerin performansı, hayvancılık alanında faaliyet gösteren birliklerden daha yüksektir. Birliklerin ürün pazarlama, girdi temini ve ihracatta daha aktif olarak rol almaları ve proje kapasitelerinin geliştirilmesinin örgütsel performanslarının geliştirilmesine önemli katkıları olabilecektir.

show abstract

An Overview of the Evolution of Agricultural Cooperatives in Québec

Cited by 12 publications

References 3 publications

Developing a conceptual framework for the co-operative and mutual enterprise business model

Developing a conceptual framework for the co-operative and mutual enterprise business model

Competition in Canada's Agricultural Value Chains: The Case of Grain

Performance measurement in the agricultural producer unions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About