2018
DOI: 10.14720/aas.2018.111.1.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of molecular identification of insect fauna with special emphasis on chalcid wasps (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of India

Abstract: Identifying organisms has grown in importance as we monitor the biological effects of global climate change and attempt to preserve species diversity in the face of accelerating habitat destruction. Classical taxonomy falls short in this race to catalogue biological diversity before it disappears. Differentiating subtle anatomical differences between closely related species requires the subjective judgment of highly trained specialists -and few are being trained in institutes today. DNA barcodes allow non-expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 5169 hymenopteran species out of 150000 have been barcoded globally. In India, only 167 species of Hymenoptera have been subjected to barcoding where 58 belong to superfamily Chalcidoidea including 44 Trichogrammatidae, 5 Eulophidae, 2 Torymidae and 7 Encyrtidae species (Rasool et al 2018). The previous studies of the chalcid wasps of Bangladesh have been described and illustrated mostly at morphological level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 5169 hymenopteran species out of 150000 have been barcoded globally. In India, only 167 species of Hymenoptera have been subjected to barcoding where 58 belong to superfamily Chalcidoidea including 44 Trichogrammatidae, 5 Eulophidae, 2 Torymidae and 7 Encyrtidae species (Rasool et al 2018). The previous studies of the chalcid wasps of Bangladesh have been described and illustrated mostly at morphological level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is to be noted that some of the methods are still applicable for characterization of plant genetic resources. (Haymer, 2016;Franck et al, 2017;Rasool et al, 2018;El Sheikha, 2019) • weeds (Darling and Blum, 2007;Stewart et al, 2009;Tranel and Horvath, 2009;Božić et al, 2019) • any species (Pereira et al, 2008; Singh, 2012) Polyphasic taxonomy…”
Section: Comparison or Combined Use Of Conventional And Molecular Metmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 describe the review of major molecular methods used for characterization of plants' traits and pests with continuous advancements on biosystematics and DNA Fingerprinting of genetic resources. These molecular methods are routinely used for detection, diagnosis, indexing of pests such as (i) DNA Barcoding (ii) DNA hybridization (iii) DNA Markers: diagnosis, diversity analysis, fingerprinting, (iv) DNA sequencing, (v) Microarray, (vii) Biosensors and Nanobiosensors (Bionanotechnology tools, diagnosis, indexing, (Astrin et al, 2013;Kress et al, 2015;Purty and Chatterjee, 2016) Identification of microbial communities (Kaur, 2015;Miller et al, 2016;Chaudhary and Dahal, 2017) Agriculturally important insects (Jalali et al, 2015;Rasool et al, 2018); Arthropods (Ashfaq and Heber. 2016) Invasive grasses (Wang et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2017) DNA hybridization study of hybrid lineages, genetic improvement and evolution (Silva and Souza, 2013;López-Caamal and Tovar-Sánchez, 2014;Ramzan et al, 2017) Detection of pathogens using serological and DNAhybridization (Martinelli et al, 2015;Fang and Ramasamy, 2015;Patel et al, 2016;Lau and Botella, 2017) Hybridization markers for detection of insects DNA Markers: diagnosis, diversity analysis, fingerprinting…”
Section: Microarraymentioning
confidence: 99%