2007
DOI: 10.2466/pms.105.3.997-1014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of Coefficient Alpha and a Reliability Matrix for Estimating Adequacy of Internal Consistency Coefficients with Psychological Research Measures

Abstract: The present article addresses issues in reliability assessment that are often neglected in psychological research such as acceptable levels of internal consistency for research purposes, factors affecting the magnitude of coefficient alpha (alpha), and considerations for interpreting alpha within the research context. A new reliability matrix anchored in classical test theory is introduced to help researchers judge adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with research measures. Guidelines and cautions in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
332
2
23

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 420 publications
(410 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
12
332
2
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Reliability of the intrinsic motivation scales, the three extrinsic motivation subscales and amotivation scale were analysed using Cronbach's alpha. A value of .70 was regarded as an acceptable value (Ponterotto & Ruckdeschel, 2007). However, Cronbach's alpha is affected by sample size and number of items (Field, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability of the intrinsic motivation scales, the three extrinsic motivation subscales and amotivation scale were analysed using Cronbach's alpha. A value of .70 was regarded as an acceptable value (Ponterotto & Ruckdeschel, 2007). However, Cronbach's alpha is affected by sample size and number of items (Field, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scales with few items are generally found to produce lower internal consistency estimates than scales with more items (Ponterotto & Ruckdeschel, 2007;Streiner & Norman, 2008), and this consideration applies to the short ASSIST scales. Moreover, these results mirror the findings of a previous study using the short ASSIST scales with mixed-discipline master's degree students (Heinström, 2005), where Cronbach's α was 0.66 (deep approach), 0.63 (surface approach) and 0.67 (strategic approach).…”
Section: Factor Structure and Internal Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PorĂ©m, o valor de 0,67 apresentado pela EISPE Ă© apontado em estudos prĂ©vios como um valor de alfa bom 40 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified