Abstract:The aim of the present study is to determine the relationship between selfperceptions and social behaviors of gifted primary school children. The target population of the study consists of 874 third and fourth grade students who are from a district on the European side of Istanbul. These students are labeled as gifted according to the Primary Mental Abilities Test (7-11). 368 students (211 girls and 157 boys) participated in the research conducted in 16 primary schools. The Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept… Show more
“…Traditional psychotherapeutic interventions such as cognitive-behavioral therapy or solution-focused brief therapy could be delivered in private practice and community mental health services including individual or group sessions, helping gifted youth overcome the difficulties associated with their giftedness. Given that gifted individuals often tend to hide serious socio-emotional issues, psychologists and therapists need to carefully go beyond what parents or teachers note as unique concerns and needs (Aslan, 2018). Moreover, gifted youth can also be supported using informal counseling formats such as books and movies focusing on gifted individuals to inspire them to be more passionate and work harder at developing their talents.…”
Section: Implications For Gifted Educationmentioning
A literature review was conducted to examine the shaping of giftedness during childhood, a period when crucial developmental changes that affect academic outlook and psychosocial wellness take place. The search of the literature covered articles published in English without restriction on publication year in the following databases: PsycINFO, Google Scholar, EBSCOhost, ERIC, and ProQuest. A total of 95 sources were categorized into two thematic areas that include (a) cognitive development of gifted children and (b) socio-emotional development of gifted children. The analysis of the literature reveals that although superior performance constitutes a key element in the notion of giftedness, ability alone cannot lead a gifted child to personal excellence and long-term commitment within a talent domain as it is insufficient to explain outstanding achievements across the life course. Indeed, these publications provide some evidence that the process of nurturing giftedness in children is determined by the dynamic interaction between individual strengths and a supportive environment, which can stimulate or inhibit the full use of a child's ability. Finally, this review is intended to change the way researchers, school practitioners, and policymakers think about the limits and capabilities of gifted children, and to provide suggestions for strategies to support their development.
“…Traditional psychotherapeutic interventions such as cognitive-behavioral therapy or solution-focused brief therapy could be delivered in private practice and community mental health services including individual or group sessions, helping gifted youth overcome the difficulties associated with their giftedness. Given that gifted individuals often tend to hide serious socio-emotional issues, psychologists and therapists need to carefully go beyond what parents or teachers note as unique concerns and needs (Aslan, 2018). Moreover, gifted youth can also be supported using informal counseling formats such as books and movies focusing on gifted individuals to inspire them to be more passionate and work harder at developing their talents.…”
Section: Implications For Gifted Educationmentioning
A literature review was conducted to examine the shaping of giftedness during childhood, a period when crucial developmental changes that affect academic outlook and psychosocial wellness take place. The search of the literature covered articles published in English without restriction on publication year in the following databases: PsycINFO, Google Scholar, EBSCOhost, ERIC, and ProQuest. A total of 95 sources were categorized into two thematic areas that include (a) cognitive development of gifted children and (b) socio-emotional development of gifted children. The analysis of the literature reveals that although superior performance constitutes a key element in the notion of giftedness, ability alone cannot lead a gifted child to personal excellence and long-term commitment within a talent domain as it is insufficient to explain outstanding achievements across the life course. Indeed, these publications provide some evidence that the process of nurturing giftedness in children is determined by the dynamic interaction between individual strengths and a supportive environment, which can stimulate or inhibit the full use of a child's ability. Finally, this review is intended to change the way researchers, school practitioners, and policymakers think about the limits and capabilities of gifted children, and to provide suggestions for strategies to support their development.
“…Indeed, during early childhood, positive self-esteem and selfperception are important determinants of personal creativity and productivity (Park & Park, 2015) and contribute to psychosocial functioning and adaptive prosocial behavior (Mann, Hosman, Schaalma & de Vries, 2004). Furthermore, positive self-perception has been linked to greater academic attainment and persistence (Marsh & Craven, 2006) and improved school engagement (Cava & Musitu, 2000), as well as to the ability of students to make positive adjustments to their behavior (Arslan & Yukay-Yuksel, 2018). Conversely, low self-esteem and negative self-perception are factors that increase mental health problems and risky behaviors, and are generally linked to underachievement among gifted students (Supple, Su, Plunket, Peterson & Bush, 2013).…”
Social-emotional learning (SEL) and mental health preventive programs are very popular internationally; however, there is limited research evaluating their effects on gifted children. This study aimed to design a SEL-focused preventive program for gifted preschoolers and assess its effects on variables related to personal and character strengths. In addition, the relative differential impact of the program on both genders was explored. The study used an experimental design, with repeated pretest-post-test measures and a control group. A total of 120 gifted students aged 5-6 years were recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 60) and control (n = 60) groups. To measure the dependent variables, two assessment instruments were administered before and after the program. The experimental group joined a 12 onehour lesson program based on SEL principles and used cognitive-behavior strategies. At the baseline, no significant difference between the groups in terms of self-esteem and self-perceptions (p > 0.005) were observed, except for peer relations selfperception (p = 0.028). The results revealed that the program was effective in increasing students' self-esteem and self-perception scores; moreover, the analysis showed a significant group-by-time interaction effect in the assessed variables (p < 0.005). Regardless of the impact of the program on both genders, the change was very similar; however, the boys showed higher scores than the girls across most variables. This program significantly improved all taught skills, corroborating the findings of other studies, which support that SEL can improve children's self-esteem. The strengths and limitations of this study and the importance of implementing prevention programs to promote socio-emotional development are also discussed. To cite this article: Papadopoulos, D. (2020). Effects of a social-emotional learning-based program on self-esteem and selfperception of gifted kindergarten students: A pilot study.
“…Social skills are very important learning goals to be achieved by every student. Social skills are one the ability to create harmonious social relationships and satisfying the various parties, in the form of an adjustment to the social environment and solve social problems (Maryani, E, 2011;Yukay-Yuksel & Arslan, 2018) Learner success is not just a charismatic presenter but those that involve learners in tasks that cognitive and social conditions of the charge and teach them how to do the tasks productively (Joyce & Calhoun, 2009). Based on several studies and expert opinion on the above researchers tried to conduct research related to the influence of the learning model community of inquiry and learning styles of the students' social skills, because the knowledge of researchers has not much to research in this regard in higher.…”
This study aims to examine and describe the effect of the community of inquiry (CoI) learning model and learning styles on students' social skills. The sample used was a student of the faculty of education IAIM Bima Indonesian totaling 114 people, consisting of two experimental groups with 56 students and two control groups were 58 students. The community of inquiry (CoI) learning model was applied in the experimental group whereas the control group applied a cooperative learning model (comparison). This research is a quasi-experiment in which the analysis of prerequisites is applied; normality used the normality QQ plot and homogeneity of variance test used Levene's test. Research data were analyzed by applying the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The results of show that there are significant differences in the social skills of students who use the community of inquiry (CoI) learning model with cooperative learning model, there are differences in social skills of students in terms of the dimensions of learning styles of visual, auditory and kinesthetic, there is also an interaction between community of inquiry (CoI) learning model and learning styles on students' social skills.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.