2019
DOI: 10.29329/epasr.2019.201.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation of the Effectiveness of the Gender Equality Course with a Specific Focus on Faculties of Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the study revealed that it was found that the online distance course "Prejudice and Discrimination" did not affect gender roles attitudes and gender perceptions. When the literature was examined, studies showed that education did not affect gender role attitudes (Toraman and Özen, 2019;Karakoç et al, 2022), as well as studies showing that it affected it positively (Uzun et al, 2017;Egelioğlu Cetişli et al, 2017;Erdol and Gözütok, 2019;Koç et al, 2021). Similarly, when looking at the studies examining the effect of education on gender perception, studies showed that education had no effect (Ernst et al, 2000;Karakoç et al, 2022) as well as studies showing that it affected it positively (Seçgin and Kurnaz, 2015;Uzun et al, 2017;Gönenç et al, 2018;).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the study revealed that it was found that the online distance course "Prejudice and Discrimination" did not affect gender roles attitudes and gender perceptions. When the literature was examined, studies showed that education did not affect gender role attitudes (Toraman and Özen, 2019;Karakoç et al, 2022), as well as studies showing that it affected it positively (Uzun et al, 2017;Egelioğlu Cetişli et al, 2017;Erdol and Gözütok, 2019;Koç et al, 2021). Similarly, when looking at the studies examining the effect of education on gender perception, studies showed that education had no effect (Ernst et al, 2000;Karakoç et al, 2022) as well as studies showing that it affected it positively (Seçgin and Kurnaz, 2015;Uzun et al, 2017;Gönenç et al, 2018;).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a huge digital gender gap in the field of digital space. The number of women participating in digital information sharing is far lower than that of men, and the number of people participating in digital technology development and decision-making is even less [5]. In this case, women have little discourse power in the construction of gender identity in digital space.…”
Section: Gender Inequality In Digital Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving from this point, the basic aim of this study was to determine whether gender equality and gender predicted CSA myths or not. However, a scale assessing the perspective on gender equality of adults in the context of the "understanding that considers men superior" and the "understanding that sees women as dependent on men" was accessed in the literature (Gender Equality Scale / Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliği Ölçeği; Gözütok et al, 2017;Toraman & Özen, 2019). It was identified that this scale did not assess the psychometric features of individuals in adulthood.…”
Section: Gender Equalitymentioning
confidence: 99%