2015
DOI: 10.4324/9781315746494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
183
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
183
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…To rectify this, the common data analytic approach would be to use multilevel modeling. However, the number of organizations in our sample was limited to only 28, whereas researchers (e.g., Heck and Thomas 2000;Hox 2002) have recommended a minimum of 50-100 groups to obtain reliable multilevel-SEM results. Therefore, we used a different approach that statistically takes into account the hierarchical structure of our data, while also being consistent with the literature's recommendations related to the level-2 sample size.…”
Section: Data Analysis Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To rectify this, the common data analytic approach would be to use multilevel modeling. However, the number of organizations in our sample was limited to only 28, whereas researchers (e.g., Heck and Thomas 2000;Hox 2002) have recommended a minimum of 50-100 groups to obtain reliable multilevel-SEM results. Therefore, we used a different approach that statistically takes into account the hierarchical structure of our data, while also being consistent with the literature's recommendations related to the level-2 sample size.…”
Section: Data Analysis Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It can be seen from the table that the top 5 significant variables were: lack of adherence to municipal bylaws and regulations, wrong perception on the potential benefits of proper waste management, failure of businesses to provide customers with waste disposal bins, the status of the business operator (owner or employee), and the frequency at which business premises are inspected by municipal sanitation and health workers, in a decreasing order of strength. Results obtained from multilevel analysis (Heck & Thomas, 2015) showed that there were significant differences among the 7 categories of waste in the study. The results showed that 23.05% of the total variation in efficiency is due to differences among the 7 categories of waste produced by business enterprises operating in the City of Tshwane.…”
Section: Results Of Studymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The specific aims of the study were to assess the current state of solid waste management with regards to type of wastes and quantities of waste generated, to identify key factors that affect efficiency in the management of solid waste, and to assess the degree to which businesses adhere to norms and standards that are recommended for businesses in terms of solid waste disposal. (Hosmer & Lemeshow, 2013) and multilevel analysis (Heck & Thomas, 2015) were used for performing statistical data analyses. The statistical package STATA version 14 (2015) was used for performing data analyses.…”
Section: Objectives Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other data were captured from business records. Standard econometric analyses were performed by using Pearson's Chi-square tests of association (Hair, Black, Rabin & Anderson, 2010), the Cox proportional hazards model (Kleinbaum, Kupper, Nizam & Rosenberg, 2013), longitudinal data analysis with multilevel models (Heck & Thomas, 2015) and Marcov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms (Browne & Goldstein, 2010). The statistical package STATA version 14 (Stata Corporation, 2015) was used for data entry and analyses.…”
Section: Methods and Materials Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%