2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2007.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An international length comparison using vacuum comparators and a photoelectric incremental encoder as transfer standard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, an international length comparison with two other industrial 1D vacuum comparators using this 280 mm encoder as a transfer standard was carried out successfully. A maximum difference of only 5.5 nm, which is in the order of 2x10 -8 and in agreement within the quoted measurement uncertainties, which ranged from 3.2 nm to 6 nm, was obtained [6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, an international length comparison with two other industrial 1D vacuum comparators using this 280 mm encoder as a transfer standard was carried out successfully. A maximum difference of only 5.5 nm, which is in the order of 2x10 -8 and in agreement within the quoted measurement uncertainties, which ranged from 3.2 nm to 6 nm, was obtained [6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For the investigations reported on here, the scales were mounted on the manually operated sample supports, which have already proved their performance during the measurements of incremental encoders [5,6]. The scales were aligned vertically so that the surface at the support points are in the focal plane by using an optical probe and the pile of gage blocks used to determine the exact height of the focal plane as described in section 3.3.…”
Section: Line Scale Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 illustrates the measurement loop of the Nanometer Comparator using four different interferometer beams and the compensation principle of the residual guiding deviations, for further details see [1]. The performance of the Nanometer Comparator was proven in an international comparison of three vacuum length comparators using a 280 mm incremental length encoder as a transfer standard [2]. The measurement results of this comparison agreed within 2·10 -8 .…”
Section: Nanometer Comparatormentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The overall agreement of the traceable length measurement results was observed to be within 5.5 nm over 280 mm, i.e. the relative agreement corresponds to 2·10 -8 [15]. After this comparison was completed, the PTB could further improve the measurement performance of the Nanometer Comparator, especially by fully activating the control of the residual angular deviations of the slide movement.…”
Section: Measurement Performance On Incremental Length Encodersmentioning
confidence: 79%