An Intelligent Sensor Based Decision Support System for Diagnosing Pulmonary Ailment through Standardized Chest X-ray Scans

Abstract

Academics and the health community are paying much attention to developing smart remote patient monitoring, sensors, and healthcare technology. For the analysis of medical scans, various studies integrate sophisticated deep learning strategies. A smart monitoring system is needed as a proactive diagnostic solution that may be employed in an epidemiological scenario such as COVID-19. Consequently, this work offers an intelligent medicare system that is an IoT-empowered, deep learning-based decision support system (DSS) for the automated detection and categorization of infectious diseases (COVID-19 and pneumothorax). The proposed DSS system was evaluated using three independent standard-based chest X-ray scans. The suggested DSS predictor has been used to identify and classify areas on whole X-ray scans with abnormalities thought to be attributable to COVID-19, reaching an identification and classification accuracy rate of 89.58% for normal images and 89.13% for COVID-19 and pneumothorax. With the suggested DSS system, a judgment depending on individual chest X-ray scans may be made in approximately 0.01 s. As a result, the DSS system described in this study can forecast at a pace of 95 frames per second (FPS) for both models, which is near to real-time.

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in assistance to COVID‐19 diagnosis: A scoping review on types and evaluation methods

“…These studies also recommended the use of CDSS in future research. Finally, 68 articles met all the inclusion criteria 5,17,34–99 . The flowchart of the selection process is shown in Figure 1.…”

“…Types of CDSS to assist in diagnosing COVID‐19 are shown in Figure 4. Most of the studies used ICDSS based on ML (nonknowledge‐based CDSS) ( n = 52 [76.5%]) 34–85 . In these studies, the most common methods for designing CDSS were CNN ( n = 33), 38,40–42,45–47,49–52,54,56–69,71,72,78,82–85 SVM ( n = 8), 35,36,39,43,44,54,56,57 RF ( n = 7), 34,35,37,39,42,44,55 and KNN ( n = 7) 36,37,39,42,43,55,56 (Table 1 and Appendix ).…”

“…Most studies used a combination of performance metrics to evaluate CDSS ( n = 40) (Appendix ). In most of these studies, accuracy ( n = 43), 35–40,42–47,49–69,71,72,76–78,80–83,85 sensitivity (recall) ( n = 35) 35–37,39,41–44,46,47,49–54,56,57,61,63–69,71,72,76,78,81–85 and F1‐score ( n = 26) 34–36,39,41–43,46,47,50,52–54,56,57,60,61,63,64,66,68,69,81,82,84,85 were used (Table 2). Other metrics for evaluating ICDSS based on ML were the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), 52,56,58 receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, 34,36,70 and so on (Appendix ).…”

Espousing AI to Enhance Cost-Efficient and Immersive Experience for Human Computer Interaction

“…The AI Model [27,28] subsequently sends the gesture to the real-time database (Firebase in current research), which updates the motion parameter with the potential movement gestures (isMove, isHold or isJump). The Firebase database gives the system the most recent value of the information as well as modifications to that information by using a single API.…”

Enhancing Image for CNN-based Diagnostic of Pediatric Pneumonia through Chest Radiographs

“…A huge collection is needed for the neural network to be trained effectively. CNN models rarely generalise when built on a smaller dataset, which results in low test performance [25,26]. One approach to resolving this issue is data augmentation, which effectively enhances the underlying dataset.…”