Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1584082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved wedge calibration method for lateral force in atomic force microscopy

Abstract: An improved wedge calibration method for quantitative lateral force measurement in atomic force microscopy is presented. The improved method differs from the original one in several aspects. It utilizes a much simpler, commercially available, calibration grating and can be performed at any single specified applied load. It enables calibration of all types of probes, both integrated with sharp tips, and colloidal with any radius of curvature up to 2 μm. The improved method also simplifies considerably the calcu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
350
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 382 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
350
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All tests were carried out in air with a relative humidity (RH) of 50%-60% and room temperature of 20 °C -25 °C . After tests, friction forces were calibrated using a silicon grating with a wedge angle of 54°44' (TGF11, MikroMasch, Germany) [14]. To characterize the adhesive behavior of Si-SiO x /SiO 2 pair, the average adhesion forces F a were obtained by twenty pull-off tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All tests were carried out in air with a relative humidity (RH) of 50%-60% and room temperature of 20 °C -25 °C . After tests, friction forces were calibrated using a silicon grating with a wedge angle of 54°44' (TGF11, MikroMasch, Germany) [14]. To characterize the adhesive behavior of Si-SiO x /SiO 2 pair, the average adhesion forces F a were obtained by twenty pull-off tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is reduced to calibrating the three force constants, ␣ n , ␣ ll , and ␣ ln , for complete characterization of the mechanical responses of the AFM cantilever-tip assembly. When m =0 and * = 0, as a special case, ␣ ln vanishes and ␣ ll reduces to the calibration constant ␣ used by Varenberg et al 7 Except for special slope tests such as employed in W-LFC, 4 AFM friction tests are generally carried out with the substrate angle * = 0, for which the transformation matrix in ͑8͒ becomes the identity matrix and the force components in the sensing coordinates are identical to the components in the friction coordinates, i.e., f = f and N = N . In a typical AFM friction experiment with * = 0, a friction loop composed of forward sliding and backward sliding processes, under constant normal load, is used to get rid of the effect of the crosstalk force constant ␣ ln in ͑9a͒.…”
Section: A Deformation and Transducer Characteristics Of An Afm Fricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noticed that our definition of ␤ l gives the relationship ␤ l = / ␤, with the calibration constant ␤ used by Varenberg et al 7 Denoting the substrate angle between x and x as * , and the shear center misfit angle between OC and ŷ as m , we have the relationship 0 = *− m , and ͑3͒ can be expanded to…”
Section: A Deformation and Transducer Characteristics Of An Afm Fricmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optical lever sensitivity of each modified cantilevers was calibrated in DI water before each set of experiments. The friction force was acquired by converting the lateral signal collected by the photodetector from voltage to newton using the wedge method [54,55], where the cantilever is scanned across a calibration grating (TGF11, MikroMasch, Tallinn, Estonia) and the frictional signal is measured as a function of applied load.…”
Section: Friction Force Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%