2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved non-adiabatic FEM model of a line-to-earth fault in buried power cables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [37] a non-adiabatic Finite Element Method (FEM) model of the arc is proposed, which can be applied to model dry and wet arc tracking effects.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Arc Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [37] a non-adiabatic Finite Element Method (FEM) model of the arc is proposed, which can be applied to model dry and wet arc tracking effects.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Arc Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its ease, monitoring the temperature of the cable surface for non-embedded internal core temperature detection has attracted much interest lately. Numeric methods include the thermal circuit method (Swift et al, 2001;Liang, 2016) and the finite element method (FEM) (Klimenta et al, 2011;Ghoneim et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2022). The former was proposed by Neher (1949) since the Kennelly hypothesis (Neher and Mcgrath, 1957) was put forward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%