The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2009.2030674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Magnetic Equivalent Circuit Model for Iron-Core Linear Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus we have used more proper and convenient expression with the total magnetic flux value = Φ ℎ . (12) In Fig. 10, the magnetic force values vs. the current intensity values, are presented.…”
Section: Reluctance Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus we have used more proper and convenient expression with the total magnetic flux value = Φ ℎ . (12) In Fig. 10, the magnetic force values vs. the current intensity values, are presented.…”
Section: Reluctance Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 [mm] for distributed winding 6pole 36slot model, tooth width with 7.2[mm] for 8pole 48slot model, 9.0[mm] concentrated winding 6pole 9slot mode, 7.0[mm] for 10pole 15slot model. This means that tooth/yoke width at maximum no-load Back-EMF is equal to tooth/yoke width at maximum load torque.…”
Section: Finite Element Analysis For Stator Tooth/yoke Widthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus in this study, instead of suffering slight accuracy compared to FEA, we propose an equivalent magnetic circuit of stator, which allows fast and simple calculations for finding tooth and yoke width that optimize load torque [6][7][8]. Generally Back-EMF and load torque show the greatest values for the tooth and yoke width ratio that has the smallest magnetic resistance to magnetomotive force of permanent magnet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slot and end effects of LPMSMs can be accounted for by the magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) which is widely used due to its simplicity and fast computation [12][13][14][15][16][17]. In [13], a relatively simple and accurate MEC model is proposed for LPMSMs and the air gap flux density distribution is obtained by linear interpolation of flux densities at specific mover positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%