1951
DOI: 10.1126/science.114.2969.550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Iodine-staining Technique for Routine Laboratory Diagnosis of Intestinal Protozoa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

1954
1954
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They further state that 'the nuclear membrane appears to stain dark red to jet black while nuclear chromatin remains essentially unstained, as in the simple iodine stain'. The latter part of the statement agrees with our observations, but is contrary to the opinion expressed by Sapero et at. (1951) quoted earlier.…”
Section: Parasitic Ovacontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…They further state that 'the nuclear membrane appears to stain dark red to jet black while nuclear chromatin remains essentially unstained, as in the simple iodine stain'. The latter part of the statement agrees with our observations, but is contrary to the opinion expressed by Sapero et at. (1951) quoted earlier.…”
Section: Parasitic Ovacontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…It is best to sporulate coccidian oocysts before they have been subjected to refrigeration, since in some species (apparently a minority), refrigeration of the unsporulated oocysts prevents subse- Lawless and Strome (1951) and improved by . It was designed especially to permit identification of human protozoan trophozoites and cysts, but can also be used for helminth eggs and for parasites of domestic animals.…”
Section: Sporulation Of Coccidian Oocystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several types of qualitative and quantitative methods exist for stool examination (Lutz 1919, Hastings-Willis 1921, Faust & Melency 1924, Hoffman et al 1934, Stoll 1946, Ritchie 1948, Sapero et al 1951, Kato & Miura 1954, Blagg et al 1955, Bell 1963, Katz et al 1972, some of these techniques have operational limitations, including high cost, complexity, low sensitivity and/or reproducibility. These limitations may restrict their respective uses in large-scale surveys in the field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%