2021
DOI: 10.4000/archeosciences.9144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Use of Ground-Penetrating Radar to Identify Human Footprints

Abstract: Highlights:• Features like human footprints can be identified in two-dimensional radar profiles.• Amplitude variations associated with footprints have been demonstrated with slices.• Horizon detection methods are another avenue for detecting subsurface footprints.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of sloth tracks was not known prior to the GPR survey and was later confirmed when the prints became partially visible after a period of precipitation (a) [120]. Three-dimensional trackway surface generated with horizon detection methods applied to a very high-resolution GPR dataset and the same result following subtraction of the trend surface (b) [121].…”
Section: Small Archaeological Features Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of sloth tracks was not known prior to the GPR survey and was later confirmed when the prints became partially visible after a period of precipitation (a) [120]. Three-dimensional trackway surface generated with horizon detection methods applied to a very high-resolution GPR dataset and the same result following subtraction of the trend surface (b) [121].…”
Section: Small Archaeological Features Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Wiewel et al [121] studied a real-scale model of buried human footprints, to stress the capability of GPR in such an imaging goal, and they produced a 3D image of the clay soil interface containing the footprints with a horizon detection processing technique. The final experimental dataset was collected with an antenna of 2.6 GHz nominal frequency and 10 cm of interline distance, but even 900 MHz and 2 GHz systems were tested.…”
Section: Small Archaeological Features Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%