2009
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.i.00498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Model for Kinematic Analysis of the Knee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical range of IE rotation for the fixed bearing PS design in our study was predicted to be 41, close to Nakamura et al (2010) (1.872.01) and Victor et al (2005) (51), while for the high-flex design we are in agreement with Most (2004). Analyzing the fixed bearing guided motion TKA, we could find studies (Victor et al, 2010Bellemans et al, 2002) where the measured range of AP translation (2072 mm, 2272 mm, and 23.6 72.9 mm respectively) was similar to ours (20.32 mm). The results obtained for the high flex design are in agreement with Victor et al (2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The theoretical range of IE rotation for the fixed bearing PS design in our study was predicted to be 41, close to Nakamura et al (2010) (1.872.01) and Victor et al (2005) (51), while for the high-flex design we are in agreement with Most (2004). Analyzing the fixed bearing guided motion TKA, we could find studies (Victor et al, 2010Bellemans et al, 2002) where the measured range of AP translation (2072 mm, 2272 mm, and 23.6 72.9 mm respectively) was similar to ours (20.32 mm). The results obtained for the high flex design are in agreement with Victor et al (2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Lack of the screw-home mechanism post TKA has also been noted in other studies [19,28,29]; the fact that it was also eliminated in a TKA that retains the ACL perhaps confirms that this movement occurs due to a combination of the geometrical characteristics of the tibiofemoral joint [30] and the actions of the cruciate ligaments [31]. It has been previously demonstrated in-vitro that a BCR TKA has kinematics closer to the intact knee than an ACL sacrificing TKA, although stability was not examined in that study [15].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…There is in vivo evidence of a satisfaction and function gap between unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and TKA patients [10,11], and also that a bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) TKA (that keeps both the PCL and ACL) can improve replaced knee motion and corresponding patient satisfaction compared to conventional TKA [12][13][14]. However, these devices have only once been evaluated mechanically [15] and they have seldom been used clinically beyond their surgeon-inventors. One example of such is a new device, developed by Biomet (Warsaw, IN, USA), which is being used in clinical trials [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loaded squat was reproduced numerically, simulating an existing knee kinematics rig (Maletsky, 1999;Victor et al, 2009cVictor et al, , 2010 in terms of geometries, constraints, inputs and outputs. The simulated machine and its function and constraints are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Model Of the Replaced Kneementioning
confidence: 99%