2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tibio-femoral kinematics in different total knee arthroplasty designs during a loaded squat: A numerical sensitivity study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predicted in vivo knee joint forces and motions can readily be used to predict the surface wear of the TKR using the methodology already established [1]. All previous wear predictions have used fixed load/kinematics for the wear simulation of TKR, and not considered the effect of the change of kinematics/load due to tibial insert geometry variation caused by wear [30][31][32][33]. The use of fixed load/motion in the wear simulation means that the change of these input conditions, which affects the multi-directional cross-shear motion [34,35], has not been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted in vivo knee joint forces and motions can readily be used to predict the surface wear of the TKR using the methodology already established [1]. All previous wear predictions have used fixed load/kinematics for the wear simulation of TKR, and not considered the effect of the change of kinematics/load due to tibial insert geometry variation caused by wear [30][31][32][33]. The use of fixed load/motion in the wear simulation means that the change of these input conditions, which affects the multi-directional cross-shear motion [34,35], has not been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tibia is fixed in the region corresponding to the ankle [11,18,24,41]. Loads and kinematics were applied to the femur to dynamically replicate walking and squatting motor [19,22,[34][35][36]. In particular, for the simulated gait task, the boundary conditions were defined by the ISO-14243-1 [22,35] in terms of flexion extension, axial force, anteroposterior translation and internal-external rotation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, orthopaedist present during experimental session, analysed patients radiography to exclude possible recognisable anomalies. However, a measure of arthroplasty positioning was not provided even if Authors know that an arthroplasty misalignment can produce alterations on dynamics and kinematics both for TKA 8,14,28,29 and for UKA 30 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%