1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0308-0161(99)00053-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of multiaxial fatigue life assessment methods for engineering components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are attempts to include different mechanisms of fatigue process (Mode I, II, III, stage I, stage II, etc.) to fatigue life calculation through: -application of several criteria based on different fracture mechanism; fatigue lifetime is established by a criterion based on the highest damage level (Das and Sivakumar, 1999), -summation of damage levels calculated according to several multiaxial criteria (Socie, 1987. 7.…”
Section: Summary Of the Research Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are attempts to include different mechanisms of fatigue process (Mode I, II, III, stage I, stage II, etc.) to fatigue life calculation through: -application of several criteria based on different fracture mechanism; fatigue lifetime is established by a criterion based on the highest damage level (Das and Sivakumar, 1999), -summation of damage levels calculated according to several multiaxial criteria (Socie, 1987. 7.…”
Section: Summary Of the Research Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, Kandi, Brown, and Miller proposed a specific form of the shear strain and the normal strain on the critical plane [6] , which is considered as a most common model. Recently, many researchers have defined the fatigue life as a combination of the shear strain (stress) and the normal strain (stress) on the maximum shear strain (stress) plane [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] . Wang and Brown presented a simple path-independent multiaxial fatigue damage criterion based on Brown and Miller's critical plane theory [11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24], is a method to determine fatigue damage under multiaxial conditions. A chosen fatigue indicator parameter, FIP, is evaluated on all candidate planes, defined in 3D by the angles θ and θ R , as shown in Figure 6(a).…”
Section: Representation Of Multiaxial Fatigue Damagementioning
confidence: 99%