2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of different microbial and rapid tests for determining inhibitors in milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
13
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
3
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, at these concentrations, the pH of the milk samples was high, reaching pH of 9.82-10.80 for the highest concentrations tested, which could also inhibit the growth of the microorganism and thus, prevent the colour change of the test indicator system. These results agree with the results obtained by Zvirdauskiene and Salomskiene (2007) and Salomskiene et al (2013) who studied the effects of various commercial detergents on the microbial test response in cow milk, and found false positive results at alkaline detergent concentrations equivalent to the dose recommended by the manufactures and above. Although, it should be noted that these high concentrations are very unlikely to be found in practice, even with poor cleaning routines.…”
Section: Effect Of Detergents In Goat Milk On the Rate Of False-positsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides, at these concentrations, the pH of the milk samples was high, reaching pH of 9.82-10.80 for the highest concentrations tested, which could also inhibit the growth of the microorganism and thus, prevent the colour change of the test indicator system. These results agree with the results obtained by Zvirdauskiene and Salomskiene (2007) and Salomskiene et al (2013) who studied the effects of various commercial detergents on the microbial test response in cow milk, and found false positive results at alkaline detergent concentrations equivalent to the dose recommended by the manufactures and above. Although, it should be noted that these high concentrations are very unlikely to be found in practice, even with poor cleaning routines.…”
Section: Effect Of Detergents In Goat Milk On the Rate Of False-positsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Žvirdauskiene and Salomskiene (2007) and Salomskiene et al (2013) found false positive results at alkaline detergent concentrations equivalent to the dose recommended by the manufactures and above. Also, these authors did not find interferences due to the presence of acid detergents in milk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies by Žvirdauskienė and Šalomskienė compared the the tests such as LPT, MaI-1, Copan, Valio T 101, Penzym S, β-STAR, SNAP and ROSA tests showed that the Copan test was simple to use and interpret, had a long shelf life and was sensitive to all β-lactams [15] . Since the dairy factories rely on milk for production of yogurt and cream and dairy from the very first, thus milk containing antibiotics can cause economic losses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods either are qualitative, quantitative or semiquantitative and have one or more limitations in terms of precision, accuracy, sensitivity, cost and infrastructure requirement (Zvirdauskiene and Salomskiene 2007). Therefore, the present investigation was undertaken to develop a microbial assay for the specific detection of β-lactam antibiotics in milk based on induction of ß-lactamase (Davis et al 1974;Imsande et al 1972;Pollock 1950;Pollock 1961;Fonze et al 2002) in spore forming bacilli (Chen et al 2003;Kotiranta et al 2000;Drobniewski 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%