1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0270-4684(86)80013-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An equivalence model for vocabulary acquisition in profoundly hearing-impaired children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the posttests indicated functional interdependence between reading (CD) and tacting (BD). These results also corroborate previous findings about the ability of equivalence relations to produce interrelations between verbal operants and establish one repertoire from another (de Rose et al, 1996;Hollis et al, 1986;Mackay & Sidman, 1984;Sidman, 1971;Sidman, 1986). Some studies in the area of equivalence used oral tacts (BD) to provide oral-textual (CD) responses (de Rose et al, 1996), whereas the present study and other studies that evaluated children with CIs used an inverse route and improved tacting pictures (BD) from previously established reading (CD) skills (Almeida-Verdu & Golfeto, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the posttests indicated functional interdependence between reading (CD) and tacting (BD). These results also corroborate previous findings about the ability of equivalence relations to produce interrelations between verbal operants and establish one repertoire from another (de Rose et al, 1996;Hollis et al, 1986;Mackay & Sidman, 1984;Sidman, 1971;Sidman, 1986). Some studies in the area of equivalence used oral tacts (BD) to provide oral-textual (CD) responses (de Rose et al, 1996), whereas the present study and other studies that evaluated children with CIs used an inverse route and improved tacting pictures (BD) from previously established reading (CD) skills (Almeida-Verdu & Golfeto, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although CIs provide immediate auditory detection, more complex listening skills (e.g., auditory discrimination, recognition, and comprehension [Erber, 1982]) require learning (Fagan & Pisoni, 2010;Houston et al, 2012;Levine et al, 2016;Pisoni, 2000). Hollis, Fulton, and Larson (1986) verified the generality of Sidman's (1971) equivalence model as a tool for teaching vocabulary in children with hearing loss. More recently, studies have extended the equivalence model (Sidman, 2000;Sidman & Tailby, 1982) to investigate and analyze meaning that is acquired from auditory stimuli in CI users (Almeida-Verdu et al, 2008;da Silva et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few demonstrations of equivalence class formation by individuals with one sensory impai rment (deafness) (Barnes, McCullagh, & Keenan, 1990;Hollis, Fulton, & Larson, 1986;Osborne & Gatch, 1989). The results of the current experiment show the formation of equivalence classes by individuals with two severe sensory impairments: deafness and blindness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…The results of the current experiment suggest that equivalence class procedures might be a reliable method of establishing the interchangeability of Braille symbols, tactual signs, and the objects they represent. This, in turn, should facilitate the establishment of communication skills of individuals with sensory deficits such as deafness and blindness (Barnes et aL , 1990;Godfrey & Costello, 1995;Goodall & Everson, 1995;Hollis et aL , 1986;Osborne & Gatch, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, such outcomes are more likely when stimulus classes that are established by training relate to existing receptive and expressive repertoires. Indeed, Sidman's findings have been replicated across a variety of procedures with participants who possess such entry skills despite considerable variation in developmental status and hearing acuity (e.g., Hollis, Fulton, & Larson, 1986;Joyce & Wolking, 1989;Mackay, 1985;Mackay & Sidman, 1984;Osborne & Gatch, 1989;Stromer, 1996a). Sidman's (1971) and Sidman and Cresson's (1973) name-referent (e.g., picture, word, and symbol) matching procedures have also been used with young children without developmental disorders (Sidman, Kirk, & Willson-Morris, 1985;Sidman & Tailby, 1982;Sidman et al, 1986) and persons with mental retardation (Green, 1990;Sidman et al, 1986).…”
Section: Matching To Sample and Class Formationmentioning
confidence: 97%