“…Such a period is defined as handover latency [12]. MIPv6 mobility management process provides long handover delays, significant packet losses, and high mobility signaling overheads, thus unacceptable and detrimental for real-time applications, causing user-perceptible service deterioration during handover [11] [13] To improve the performance of MIPv6, many mobility protocols have been proposed by IETF and researchers at industry and university, such as FMIPv6 [5], HMIPv6 [4], FHMIPv6 [6] [7], simultaneous bindings for FMIPv6 or sbFMIPv6 [14], a novel FMIPv6 and HMIPv6 integration mechanism [15], enhanced fast handover with low latency for mobile IPv6 [16], simplified fast handover in mobile IPv6 networks [17], an efficient scheme for fast handover over HMIPv6 [18], seamless MIPv6 (SMIPv6) [19], to name a few. These solutions can be sorted into two categories: network architecture design and fast handover scheme.…”