1999
DOI: 10.1139/f98-169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical model of fleet dynamics in New England trawl fisheries

Abstract: Regulations and changes in market and environmental conditions that change the profitability of one fishery or area will result in a redistribution of fishing effort among alternative fisheries or areas. The magnitude of this effort displacement will depend on the relative profitability of the alternatives for the individual fishers affected. When fishing areas and fishers are heterogeneous, simple aggregate effort models such as those based on ideal free distribution theory may provide inaccurate predictions.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
80
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
9
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As it has been underlined by Tzanatos et al [11], in the short-term, the choice of fishing tactics or métiers depends on multitude of factors: recent yield and income, market demand and price, seasonal availability of fishing grounds, tradition, skippers' experience, rumors about other fishermen yields, etc. Hence, changes in the biological or economic conditions results in a rapid redistribution of the fishing effort of artisanal fisheries [50], as it has been also shown in this case study throughout the high alternation between different métiers and gear types along one fishing season. Although the average landings weight was 99.19 kg and the average income was €396.65 per sale bill in 2009, Asturian artisanal métiers showed significant differences: the rod-hook targeting Scomber scombrus is the métier that generates the highest weight (1468 kg) and income (€886), being also important the Merluccius longline and gillnet métier (an average income of €434 and €425 respectively per fishing day) and the Lophius trammel net métier (€423), whereas 50% of Asturian active artisanal métiers registered an average income per fishing day under €350 in 2009.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…As it has been underlined by Tzanatos et al [11], in the short-term, the choice of fishing tactics or métiers depends on multitude of factors: recent yield and income, market demand and price, seasonal availability of fishing grounds, tradition, skippers' experience, rumors about other fishermen yields, etc. Hence, changes in the biological or economic conditions results in a rapid redistribution of the fishing effort of artisanal fisheries [50], as it has been also shown in this case study throughout the high alternation between different métiers and gear types along one fishing season. Although the average landings weight was 99.19 kg and the average income was €396.65 per sale bill in 2009, Asturian artisanal métiers showed significant differences: the rod-hook targeting Scomber scombrus is the métier that generates the highest weight (1468 kg) and income (€886), being also important the Merluccius longline and gillnet métier (an average income of €434 and €425 respectively per fishing day) and the Lophius trammel net métier (€423), whereas 50% of Asturian active artisanal métiers registered an average income per fishing day under €350 in 2009.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Results highlight the tangible value social networks can play in supporting fishers' livelihoods. Information acquired can contribute to fishers' accumulated knowledge of the marine environment, aiding evaluation of decisions about fishing behavior and potentially conferring a comparative advantage (Holland and Sutinen 1999). However, the varying centrality of individuals in the networks shows that positional advantages gained through information sharing may not be equally distributed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some representations do not explicitly include economics but rather make simple assumptions about changes in the spatial distribution of effort caused by MPAs (e.g., Beverton and Holt 1957;Holland and Brazee 1996;Halpern et al 2004;Kaplan and Botsford 2005). Other papers explicitly include economics and tend to be more focused on the fishery sector rather than the managed population (e.g., Holland and Sutinen 1999;Wilen 2003, 2004;Hicks and Schnier 2006). Both classes of studies provide insights as to how MPAs can perform as a fishery management tool.…”
Section: Economic Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%