2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical evaluation of the overconfidence hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

33
170
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
33
170
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They suggested that students motivated by their parents and their society to consider themselves better than others. Chuang and Lee (2006) provided some evidence on the existence of overconfidence in capital markets. They showed that overconfident investors react to private information.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggested that students motivated by their parents and their society to consider themselves better than others. Chuang and Lee (2006) provided some evidence on the existence of overconfidence in capital markets. They showed that overconfident investors react to private information.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excessive trading volume of overconfident investors contributes to excessive volatility. Chuang and Lee [15] provided an empirical structure to identify if excessive volatility is caused by overconfidence of investors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their theoretical models stipulate that if investors are overconfident, they take more risky positions than they were rational. Chuang and Lee [15] found that if investors are overconfident they exchange in more risky securities following market gain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In …nance, papers include Barber and Odean (2001), Bernardo and Welch (2001), Chuang and Lee (2006), Daniel, Hirshleifer and Subrahmanyam (2001), Kyle and Wang (1997), Malmendier and Tate (2005), Peng and Xiong (2006), and Wang (2001). See Benoît and Dubra (2008) for a discussion of some of the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%