2016
DOI: 10.1108/scm-08-2015-0327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An empirical analysis of consumer motivation towards reverse exchange

Abstract: Purpose -Despite the growing interest in reverse exchange, studies on the subject from the perspective of consumer participation and motivation remain sparse. Consumers' participation in reverse exchange is a key component of supply-chain reverse logistics. To address the gap in existing studies, this paper aims to empirically identify the intention and causes of consumer electronic product exchange (EPE). The proposed research model incorporates value-belief-norm and neutralization theories, linking consumers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the hypothesized relationship are found to be positive and significant at 1% level of significance except for PBC and RCY which is significant at 5% level of significance. In terms of path coefficients, the highest impact over RCY was of ATT which is 0.294 which is in consistent with Kochan et al (2016), followed by MN and AC which has the values of 0.244 and 0.123 which is line with Yuan et al (2016) and Khan, Ahmed, and Najmi (2019) respectively, whereas SN and PBC has the lowest coefficients which are 0.101 and 0.067 which is in accordance with Khan, Ahmed, Najmi, and Younus (2019) and Arı and Yılmaz (2016) respectively. Moreover, the impact of RCY on BEH was also found to be positive with the coefficient of 0.301 and significant at 1% level of significance which is also supported by the existing literature (Khan, Ahmed, & Najmi, 2019).…”
Section: Estimations and Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…All of the hypothesized relationship are found to be positive and significant at 1% level of significance except for PBC and RCY which is significant at 5% level of significance. In terms of path coefficients, the highest impact over RCY was of ATT which is 0.294 which is in consistent with Kochan et al (2016), followed by MN and AC which has the values of 0.244 and 0.123 which is line with Yuan et al (2016) and Khan, Ahmed, and Najmi (2019) respectively, whereas SN and PBC has the lowest coefficients which are 0.101 and 0.067 which is in accordance with Khan, Ahmed, Najmi, and Younus (2019) and Arı and Yılmaz (2016) respectively. Moreover, the impact of RCY on BEH was also found to be positive with the coefficient of 0.301 and significant at 1% level of significance which is also supported by the existing literature (Khan, Ahmed, & Najmi, 2019).…”
Section: Estimations and Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…More importantly, with the recent advancement in service technologies, consumers are empowered to interact with LSPs in a reciprocal manner by assuming expanded roles as both receivers and providers of resources (Sampson and Spring, 2012). Online shopping, reverse logistics (Yuan et al, 2016), self-collection (Morganti et al, 2014;Yuen et al, 2018) and crowd-sourcing delivery (Carbone et al, 2017) are all substantive evidence of consumer participation in logistics activities. As critically pointed out by Carbone et al (2017), consumers are collectively forming a powerful crowd that can be potentially integrated into the formation of logistics values.…”
Section: Consumer Logisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening the literature for sustainability tensions and SCs, a range of tensions are discussed either as purely conceptual in SSCM or its functions [29,34], in industry specific case studies [35,36] or in multi-industry studies on an individual level [37,38]. With regard to this study, we see overlaps in the reverse exchange of electronic products [36], the call for a systems perspective [34] and the supply chain position paradox [37].…”
Section: Sustainability Tensions In Supply Chain Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to this study, we see overlaps in the reverse exchange of electronic products [36], the call for a systems perspective [34] and the supply chain position paradox [37]. The underlying study design thus takes up the most recent calls and research directions in corporate sustainability tensions research.…”
Section: Sustainability Tensions In Supply Chain Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%