2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient multi-time-step method for train-track-bridge interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sleeper is assumed to be fully restrained. The matrix equation of the rail is identical with Equation (1) in form [31]. The corresponding damp matrix v C is identical with v K in terms of arrangement, except for different magnitudes.…”
Section: Modelling Of Trackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sleeper is assumed to be fully restrained. The matrix equation of the rail is identical with Equation (1) in form [31]. The corresponding damp matrix v C is identical with v K in terms of arrangement, except for different magnitudes.…”
Section: Modelling Of Trackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sleeper is assumed to be fully restrained. The matrix equation of the rail is identical with Equation (1) in form [31]. Figure 4 shows the schematic diagram of track irregularity.…”
Section: Modelling Of Trackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A self-developed program called wind-train-rail structure (WTRSDYNA) is used to perform a case study [8,10,31]. The time-step size of the program solution is determined to be 2 × 10 −4 s. The dynamic responses (i.e.…”
Section: Solving Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the "fish-bone" model (Asgari et al 2013), the equivalent orthotropic shell element model has better structural details and was a better simulation for stiffness and mass distribution in the bridge deck sections. A two-layer track model, presented in Zhu et al (2018), was selected for modeling rails and sleepers. Of note, because these components have one dominant dimension, they were approximated by beam elements.…”
Section: Fe Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%