2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient microcapsule catalyst for one-step ethanol synthesis from dimethyl ether and syngas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, coaxial 3D printing technology can also integrate zeolites with different topologies and diverse metal oxides, which has been proven to be a versatile technique for compositing and constructing zeolite‐based core–shell structures. As illustration for the preparation, 3D‐FeMnO x @ZSM‐5 and 3D‐CuZnO x @MOR monoliths with tailorable geometries were 3D printed, which could be used for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis [ 44 ] and ethanol synthesis from dimethyl ether and syngas, [ 45 ] respectively (Figure S22, Supporting Information). The obtained 3D‐FeMnO x @ZSM‐5 and 3D‐CuZnO x @MOR monoliths with honeycomb shape (Figure 5e,g) exhibit complete core–shell structure from the cross‐section view of SEM images (Figure 5f,h and Figures S23 and S24, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, coaxial 3D printing technology can also integrate zeolites with different topologies and diverse metal oxides, which has been proven to be a versatile technique for compositing and constructing zeolite‐based core–shell structures. As illustration for the preparation, 3D‐FeMnO x @ZSM‐5 and 3D‐CuZnO x @MOR monoliths with tailorable geometries were 3D printed, which could be used for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis [ 44 ] and ethanol synthesis from dimethyl ether and syngas, [ 45 ] respectively (Figure S22, Supporting Information). The obtained 3D‐FeMnO x @ZSM‐5 and 3D‐CuZnO x @MOR monoliths with honeycomb shape (Figure 5e,g) exhibit complete core–shell structure from the cross‐section view of SEM images (Figure 5f,h and Figures S23 and S24, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preparation of 3D-CuZnO x @MOR: The conventional co-precipitation approach was used to prepare CuZnO x powder (Figure S26a, Supporting Information). [45] To obtain CuZnO x ink, CuZnO x (1.7 g), HNTs (0.3 g), and appropriate amount of 2% HPMC aqueous were mixed and stirred for 30 min. Commercial MOR zeolite (1.7 g, Figure S26b, Supporting Information, Nankai Catalyst Corporation, China), HNTs (0.3 g), and 2% HPMC aqueous (2 g) were stirred for 30 min to get MOR zeolite ink.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated that core− shell catalyst prepared with Cu/ZnO as core and Cu-MOR as shell demonstrated outstanding selectivity of 45.9% for ethanol. 118 Their increased proximity between the acid sites and the metal further reduced coking resulting in remarkable stability for the catalyst. Similar work was investigated for direct syngas conversion to ethanol over RhMn and S-1 catalysts.…”
Section: Effects Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Du et al investigated a series of Cu, -MOR composite catalysts prepared as impregnated catalysts and core–shell catalysts to synthesize ethanol for syngas and DME. The results indicated that core–shell catalyst prepared with Cu/ZnO as core and Cu-MOR as shell demonstrated outstanding selectivity of 45.9% for ethanol . Their increased proximity between the acid sites and the metal further reduced coking resulting in remarkable stability for the catalyst.…”
Section: Syngas To Oxygenatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this indirect route suffers from multiple processes and high energy consumptionin particular, the product separation for each process. In recent years, the direct synthesis of ethanol from DME and syngas over catalyst combinations of layer-by-layer and physical mixture or capsule catalysts has been proposed (Figure , Route D). H–MOR was used for DME carbonylation, and Cu-based catalysts worked for MA hydrogenation during the reaction. However, the ethanol selectivity was typically limited at 40–49%, since ethanol and methanol were simultaneously produced in a molar ratio of 1:1 by MA hydrogenation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%