2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.10.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient metal-free sensitizer for dye-sensitized solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optical band gap ( E g ) of PDiCP homopolymer film calculated using Planck equation was 2.58 eV: E g = 1241/ λ onset where the onset UV absorption wavelength ( λ onset ) of the π-π* transition band of PDiCP was 481 nm [35,36]. The onset oxidation potential vs. Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) was 0.82 V, the E FOC of ferrocene/ferrocenium vs. Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) determined using cyclic voltammetry was 0.80 V, and the onset oxidation potential vs. E FOC was found to be 0.02 V. The HOMO and LUMO energy levels of PDiCP determined from the onset oxidation potential with respect to the energy level of ferrocene/ferrocenium couple (−4.8 eV less than vacuum energy level) [37,38] and E g were taken as −4.82 and −2.24 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optical band gap ( E g ) of PDiCP homopolymer film calculated using Planck equation was 2.58 eV: E g = 1241/ λ onset where the onset UV absorption wavelength ( λ onset ) of the π-π* transition band of PDiCP was 481 nm [35,36]. The onset oxidation potential vs. Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) was 0.82 V, the E FOC of ferrocene/ferrocenium vs. Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) determined using cyclic voltammetry was 0.80 V, and the onset oxidation potential vs. E FOC was found to be 0.02 V. The HOMO and LUMO energy levels of PDiCP determined from the onset oxidation potential with respect to the energy level of ferrocene/ferrocenium couple (−4.8 eV less than vacuum energy level) [37,38] and E g were taken as −4.82 and −2.24 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon applying potentials more than 1.2 V, the peaks of P(MPS-co-TTPA), P(MPO-co-TTPA), and P(ANIL-co-TTPA) films at 417, 369, and 385 nm, respectively, decreased little by little and their charge carrier absorption bands appeared at 964, 914, and 960 nm, respectively, implying the formation of polaron and bipolaron of copolymer films [26]. The band gap energy values (E g ) of PMPS, PMPO, PANIL, PTTPA, P(MPS-co-TTPA), P(MPO-co-TTPA), and P(ANIL-co-TTPA) can be calculated according to the following Planck equation [27,28],…”
Section: Spectroelectrochemical Studies Of Copolymer Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The E g of PMPS, PMPO, PANIL, PTTPA, P(MPS-co-TTPA), P(MPO-co-TTPA), and P(ANIL-co-TTPA) were 2. PANIL, PTTPA, P(MPS-co-TTPA), P(MPO-co-TTPA), and P(ANIL-co-TTPA) can be calculated according to the following Planck equation [27,28],…”
Section: Spectroelectrochemical Studies Of Copolymer Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optical band gap (E g ) of polymers was calculated using the wavelength value at the onset of the π-π* transition (λ onset ) based on the [49,50] and is shown in Table 3. PMDOB showed smaller band gaps than PIND when the polymer films were prepared potentiodynamically by scanning the potential between 0 V and 1.2 V for 20 cycles and prepared potentiostatically at 0.9 V (or 1.2 V) on ITO glass electrodes.…”
Section: Spectroelectrochemical Properties Of the Polymer Films In Somentioning
confidence: 99%