An edge reversal method for precision measurement of cutting edge radius of single point diamond tools

Chen, Yuan Liu; Cai, Yindi; Xu, Malu; Shimizu, Yuki; Ito, So; Gao, Wei

doi:10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.06.012

Cited by 25 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The uncertainty in R tool_m and R mark_m was evaluated to be 1.36 and 1.42 nm, respectively. The uncertainty with a coverage factor of k = 2 (95% confidence) in the measurement of the diamond tool cutting edge radius was evaluated to be 1.97 nm, which was smaller than that obtained in our previous research [22].…”

Section: Appl Sci 2020mentioning

confidence: 56%

“…As can be seen from Equation ( 4), the achievable accuracy of this method depends on the elastic recovery coefficient ξ. It has been verified that the elastic recovery coefficient, ξ, of the reverse cutting edge would be reduced to 0.012 from 0.068 when the indentation depth was increased to 20 nm from 2.5 nm based on molecular dynamics (MD) simulations [22]. The detail of the MD simulation can be found in [22] and is not repeated in this paper for the sake of clarity.…”

Section: Principle Of Measuring Cutting Edge Radiusmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…It has been verified that the elastic recovery coefficient, ξ, of the reverse cutting edge would be reduced to 0.012 from 0.068 when the indentation depth was increased to 20 nm from 2.5 nm based on molecular dynamics (MD) simulations [22]. The detail of the MD simulation can be found in [22] and is not repeated in this paper for the sake of clarity. The difference between R mark and R tool was evaluated to be 0.24 nm when the indentation depth was set to be 200 nm.…”

Section: Principle Of Measuring Cutting Edge Radiusmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Compared with the direct characterization approach, the error separation approach is more effective because no additional form surface measuring instruments are necessary [21]. An edge reversal error separation method based on an AFM was proposed for measuring cutting edge radius of diamond tool without the effect of the AFM tip radius by the authors of [22]. Firstly, a replicated cutting edge was obtained by indenting a diamond tool into a soft metal material.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

High-Precision Cutting Edge Radius Measurement of Single Point Diamond Tools Using an Atomic Force Microscope and a Reverse Cutting Edge Artifact

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a measurement method for high-precision cutting edge radius of single point diamond tools using an atomic force microscope (AFM) and a reverse cutting edge artifact based on the edge reversal method. Reverse cutting edge artifact is fabricated by indenting a diamond tool into a soft metal workpiece with the bisector of the included angle between the tool’s rake face and clearance face perpendicular to the workpiece surface on a newly designed nanoindentation system. An AFM is applied to measure the topographies of the actual and the reverse diamond tool cutting edges. With the proposed edge reversal method, a cutting edge radius can be accurately evaluated based on two AFM topographies, from which the convolution effect of the AFM tip can be reduced. The accuracy of the measurement of cutting edge radius is significantly influenced by the geometric accuracy of reverse cutting edge artifact in the proposed measurement method. In the nanoindentation system, the system operation is optimized for achieving high-precision control of the indentation depth of reverse cutting edFigurege artifact. The influence of elastic recovery and the AFM cantilever tip radius on the accuracy of cutting edge radius measurement are investigated. Diamond tools with different nose radii are also measured. The reliability and capability of the proposed measurement method for cutting edge radius and the designed nanoindentation system are demonstrated through a series of experiments.

show abstract

Section: Appl Sci 2020mentioning

confidence: 56%

Section: Principle Of Measuring Cutting Edge Radiusmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Principle Of Measuring Cutting Edge Radiusmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

High-Precision Cutting Edge Radius Measurement of Single Point Diamond Tools Using an Atomic Force Microscope and a Reverse Cutting Edge Artifact

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, for the profile measurement of the cutting tool edge, the AFM-based measurement system still requires additional measuring range and complex configuration [26,27], which is not friendly to the on-machine surface profile measurement of a precision cutting tool. Although some technologies, such as force sensor integrated fast tool servo (FS-FTS) [28,29] and edge reversal methods [30], are employed for the cutting tool edge measurement, the application of these methods is quite limited. Furthermore, they are not suitable for the on-machine measurement regarding the compensation machining of a precision cutting tool.…”

Section: Of 13mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparison of the Probes with a Cantilever Beam and a Double-Sided Beam in the Tool Edge Profiler for On-Machine Measurement of a Precision Cutting Tool

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes a comparison of the mechanical structures (a double-sided beam and a cantilever beam) of a probe in a tool edge profiler for the measurement of a micro-cutting tool. The tool edge profiler consists of a positioning unit having a pair of one-axis DC servo motor stages and a probe unit having a laser displacement sensor and a probe composed of a stylus and a mechanical beam; on-machine measurement of a tool cutting edge can be conducted with a low contact force through measuring the deformation of the probe by the laser displacement sensor while monitoring the tool position. Meanwhile, the mechanical structure of the probe could affect the performance of measurement of the edge profile of a precision cutting tool. In this paper, the measurement principle of the tool edge profile is firstly introduced; after that, slopes and a top-flat of a cutting tool sample are measured by using a cantilever-type probe and a double-sided beam-type probe, respectively. The measurement performances of the two probes are compared through experiments and theoretical measurement uncertainty analysis.

show abstract

An application of the edge reversal method for accurate reconstruction of the three-dimensional profile of a single-point diamond tool obtained by an atomic force microscope

Zhang

Shimizu

Matsukuma

et al. 2021

Int J Adv Manuf Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An edge reversal method for precision measurement of cutting edge radius of single point diamond tools

Cited by 25 publications

References 19 publications

High-Precision Cutting Edge Radius Measurement of Single Point Diamond Tools Using an Atomic Force Microscope and a Reverse Cutting Edge Artifact

High-Precision Cutting Edge Radius Measurement of Single Point Diamond Tools Using an Atomic Force Microscope and a Reverse Cutting Edge Artifact

A Comparison of the Probes with a Cantilever Beam and a Double-Sided Beam in the Tool Edge Profiler for On-Machine Measurement of a Precision Cutting Tool

An application of the edge reversal method for accurate reconstruction of the three-dimensional profile of a single-point diamond tool obtained by an atomic force microscope

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About